TYPES OF TEETH

The human permanent dentition is divided into four classes of teeth based on appearance and function or position.

Incisors, Canines, Premolars & Molars

Stationary Relationship

a) .Centric Relation is the most superior relationship of the condyle of the mandible to the articular fossa of the temporal bone as determined by the bones ligaments. and muscles of the temporomandibular joint; in an ideal dentition it is the same as centric occlusion.

(b) Canines may also be used to confirm the molar relationships to classify occlusion when molars are missing; a class I canine relationship shows the cusp tip of the maxillary canine facial to the mesiobuccal cusp of the first permanent molar

c) Second primary molars are used to classify the occlusion in a primary dentition

(d) In a mixed  dentition the first permanent molars will erupt into a normal occlusion if there is a terminal step between the distal  surfaces of maxillarv and mandibular second primary molars; if these surfaces are flush, a terminal plane exists and the first permanent molars will first erupt into an end-to-end relationship until there is a shifting of space or exfoliation of the second primary molar

MANDIBULAR CUSPIDS

Mandibular canines are those lower teeth that articulate with the mesial aspect of the upper canine.

Facial: The mandibular canine is noticeably narrower mesidistally than the upper, but the root may be as long as that of the upper canine. In an individual person,the lower canine is often shorter than that of the upper canine. The mandibular canine is wider mesiodistally than either lower incisor. A distinctive feature is the nearly straight outline of the mesial aspect of the crown and root. When the tooth is unworn, the mesial cusp ridge appears as a sort of 'shoulder' on the tooth. The mesial cusp ridge is much shorter than the distal cusp ridge.

Lingual: The marginal ridges and cingulum are less prominent than those of the maxillary canine. The lingual surface is smooth and regular. The lingual ridge, if present, is usually rather subtle in its expression.

Proximal: The mesial and distal aspects present a triangular outline. The cingulum as noted is less well developed. When the crown and root are viewed from the proximal, this tooth uniquely presents a crescent-like profile similar to a cashew nut.

Incisal: The mesiodistal dimension is clearly less than the labiolingual dimension. The mesial and distal 'halves' of the tooth are more identical than the upper canine from this perspective. In the mandibular canine, the unworn incisal edge is on the line through the long axis of this tooth.

MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

The second molars are often called 12-year molars because they erupt when a child is about 12 years

Facial: The crown is shorter occluso-cervically and narrower mesiodistally whe compared to the first molar. The distobuccal cusp is visibly smaller than the mesiobuccal cusp. The two buccal roots are more nearly parallel. The roots are more parallel; the apex of the mesial root is on line with the with the buccal developmental groove. Mesial and distal roots tend to be about the same length.

Lingual: The distolingual cusp is smaller than the mesiolingual cusp. The Carabelli trait is absent.

Proximal: The crown is shorter than the first molar and the palatal root has less diverence. The roots tend to remain within the crown profile.

Occlusal: The distolingual cusp is smaller on the second than on the first molar. When it is much reduced in size, the crown outline is described as 'heart-shaped.' The Carabelli trait is usually absent. The order of cusp size, largest to smallest, is the same as the first but is more exaggerated: mesiolingual, mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and distolingual.

Contact Points; Height of Curvature: Both mesial and distal contacts tend to be centered buccolingually below the marginal ridges. Since themolars become shorter, moving from first to this molar, the contacts tend to appear more toward the center of the proximal surfaces.

Roots: There are three roots, two buccal and one lingual. The roots are less divergent than the first with their apices usually falling within the crown profile. The buccal roots tend to incline to the distal.

Note: The distolingual cusp is the most variable feature of this tooth. When it is large, the occlusal is somewhat rhomboidal; when reduced in size the crown is described as triangual or 'heart-shaped.' At times, the root may be fused.

Maxillary Third Permanent Molar

They are the teeth most often congenitally missing

Facial: The crown is usually shorter in both axial and mesiodistal dimensions. Two buccal roots are present, but in most cases they are fused. The mesial buccal cusp is larger than the distal buccal cusp.

Lingual: In most thirds, there is just one large lingual cusp. In some cases there is a poorly developed distolingual cusp and a lingual groove. The lingual root is often fused to the to buccal cusps.

Proximal: The outline of the crown is rounded; it is often described as bulbous in dental literature. Technically, the mesial surface is the only 'proximal' surface. The distal surface does not contact another tooth.

Occlusal: The crown of this tooth is the smallest of the maxillary molars. The outline of the occlusal surface can be described as heart-shaped. The mesial lingual cusp is the largest, the mesial buccal is second in size, and the distal buccal cusp is the smallest.

Root Surface:-The root may have from one to as many as eight divisions. These divisions are usually fused and very often curved distally.

Differences Between the Deciduous and Permanent Teeth

1. Deciduous teeth are fewer in number and smaller in size but the deciduous molars are wider mesiodistally than the premolars. The deciduous anteriors are narrower mesiodistally than their permanent successors. Remember the leeway space that we discussed in the unit on occlusion?

2. Their enamel is thinner and whiter in appearance. Side by side, this is obvious in most young patients.

3. The crowns are rounded. The deciduous teeth are constricted at the neck (cervix).

4. The roots of deciduous anterior teeth are longer and narrower than the roots of their permanent successors.

5. The roots of deciduous molars are longer and more slender than the roots of the permanent molars. Also, they flare greatly.

6. The cervical ridges of enamel seen on deciduous teeth are more prominent than on the permanent teeth. This 'bulge' is very pronounced at the mesiobuccal of deciduous first molars.

G. Deciduous cervical enamel rods incline incisally/occlusally.