Erythema Multiforme

• Characteristics: Erythema multiforme presents with "target" or "bull's eye" lesions, often associated with:
  • Etiologic Factors:
    • Herpes simplex infection.
    • Mycoplasma infection.
    • Drug reactions (e.g., sulfonamides, penicillins, phenylbutazone, phenytoin).

Anatomy and Histology of the Periodontium

Gingiva (normal clinical appearance): no muscles, no glands; keratinized

• Color: coral pink but does vary with individuals and races due to cutaneous pigmentation
• Papillary contour: pyramidal shape with one F and one L papilla and the col filling interproximal space to the contact area (col the starting place gingivitis)
• Marginal contour: knife-edged and scalloped
• Texture: stippled (orange-peel texture); blow air to dry out and see where stippling ends to see end of gingiva
• Consistency: firm and resilient (push against it and won’t move); bound to underlying bone
• Sulcus depth: 0-3mm
• Exudate: no exudates (blood, pus, water)

  Anatomic and histological structures

Gingival unit: includes periodontium above alveolar crest of bone

a. Alveolar mucosa: histology- non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium, submucosa with glands, loose connective tissue with collagen and elastin, muscles.  No epithelial ridges, no stratum granulosum (flattened cells below keratin layer)

b. Mucogingival junction: clinical demarcation between alveolar mucosa and attached gingiva

c. Attached gingiva: histology- keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges (basal cell layer, prickle cell layer, granular cell layer (stratum granulosum), keratin layer); no submucosa

• Dense connective tissue: predominantly collagen, bound to periosteum of bone by Sharpey fibers
• Reticular fibers between collagen fibers and are continuous with reticulin in blood vessels

d. Free gingival groove: demarcation between attached and free gingiva; denotes base of gingival sulcus in normal gingiva; not always seen

e. Free gingival margin: area from free gingival groove to epithelial attachment (up and over ® inside)

• Oral surface: stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges
• Tooth side surface (sulcular epithelium): non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with no epithelial ridges (basal cell and prickle cell layers)

f. Gingival sulcus: space bounded by tooth surface, sulcular epithelium, and junctional epithelium; 0-3mm depth; space between epithelium and tooth

g. Dento-gingival junction: combination of epithelial and fibrous attachment

• Junctional epithelium (epithelial attachment): attachment of epithelial cells by hemi-desmosomes and sticky substances (basal lamina- 800-1200 A, DAS-acid mucopolysaccharides, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate A, C, and B), to enamel, enamel and cementum, or cementum depending on stage of passive eruption.  Length ranges from 0.25-1.35mm.
• Fibrous attachment: attachment of collagen fibers (Sharpey’s fibers) into cementum just beneath epithelial attachment; ~ 1mm thick

h. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated (for pain) in connective tissue.  Both free and specialized endings for pain, touch pressure, and temperature -> proprioception.  If dentures, rely on TMJ.

i.Mesh of terminal argyophilic fibers (stain silver), some extending into epithelium

ii  Meissner-type corpuscles: pressure sensitive sensory nerve encased in CT

iii.Krause-type corpuscles: temperature receptors

iv. Encapsulated spindles

i. Gingival fibers:

i.  Gingivodental group:

• Group I (A): from cementum to free gingival margin
• Group II (B): from cementum to attached gingiva
• Group III (C): from cementum over alveolar crest to periosteum on buccal and lingual plates

ii.  Circular (ligamentum circularis): encircles tooth in free gingiva

iii. Transeptal fibers: connects cementum of adjacent teeth, runs over interdental septum of alveolar bone.  Separates gingival unit from attachment apparatus.

Transeptal and Group III fibers the major defense against stuff getting into bone and ligament.

2.  Attachment apparatus: periodontium below alveolar crest of bone

Periodontal ligament: Sharpey’s fibers (collagen) connecting cementum to bone (bundle bone).  Few elastic and oxytalan fibers associated with blood vessels and embedded in cementum in cervical third of tooth.  Components divided as follows:

i. Alveolar crest fibers: from cementum just below CEJ apical to alveolar crest of bone

ii.Horizontal fibers: just apical to alveolar crest group, run at right angles to long axis of tooth from cementum horizontally to alveolar bone proper

iii.Oblique fibers: most numerous, from cementum run coronally to alveolar bone proper

iv. Apical fibers: radiate from cementum around apex of root apically to alveolar bone proper, form socket base

v. Interradicular fibers: found only between roots of multi-rooted teeth from cementum to alveolar bone proper

vi. Intermediate plexus: fibers which splice Sharpey’s fibers from bone and cementum

vii. Epithelial Rests of Malassez: cluster and individual epithelial cells close to cementum which are remnants of Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath; potential source of periodontal cysts.

viii. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated; abundant supply of sensory free nerve endings capable of transmitting tactile pressure and pain sensation by trigeminal pathway and elongated spindle-like nerve fiber for proprioceptive impulses

Cementum: 45-50% inorganic; 50-55% organic (enamel is 97% inorganic; dentin 70% inorganic)

i.  Acellular cementum: no cementocytes; covers dentin (older) in coronal ½ to 2/3 of root, 16-60 mm thick

ii. Cellular cementum: cementocytes; covers dentin in apical ½ to 1/3 of root; also may cover acellular cementum areas in repair areas, 15-200 mm thick

iii. Precementum (cementoid): meshwork of irregularly arranged collagen in surface of cementum where formation starts

iv. Cemento-enamel junction (CEJ): 60-65% of time cementum overlaps enamel; 30% meet end-to-end; 5-10% space between

v. Cementum slower healing than bone or PDL.  If expose dentinotubules ® root sensitivity.

Alveolar bone: 65% inorganic, 35% organic

i. Alveolar bone proper (cribriform plate): lamina dura on x-ray; bundle bone receive Sharpey fibers from PDL

ii. Supporting bone: cancellous, trabecular (vascularized) and F and L plates of compact bone

Blood supply to periodontium

i. Alveolar blood vessels (inferior and superior)

A) Interalveolar: actually runs through bone then exits, main supply to alveolar bone and PDL

B) Supraperiosteal: just outside bone, to gingiva and alveolar bone

C) Dental (pulpal): to pulp and periapical area

D) Terminal vessels (supracrestal): anastomose of A and B above beneath the sulcular epithelium

E) PDL gets blood from: most from branches of interalveolar blood vessels from alveolar bone marrow spaces, supraperiosteal vessels when interalveolar vessels not present, pulpal (apical) vessels, supracrestal gingival vessels

ii. Lymphatic drainage: accompany blood vessels to regional lymph nodes (esp. submaxillary group)

Periodontal Bone Grafts

Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues.

1. Bone Blend

 Bone blend is a mixture of cortical or cancellous bone that is procured using a trephine or rongeurs, placed in an amalgam capsule, and triturated to achieve a slushy osseous mass. This technique allows for the creation of smaller particle sizes, which enhances resorption and replacement with host bone.

Particle Size: The ideal particle size for bone blend is approximately 210 x 105 micrometers.

Rationale: Smaller particle sizes improve the chances of resorption and integration with the host bone, making the graft more effective.

2. Types of Periodontal Bone Grafts

A. Autogenous Grafts

Autogenous grafts are harvested from the patient’s own body, providing the best compatibility and healing potential.

1. Cortical Bone Chips

   • History: First used by Nabers and O'Leary in 1965.
   • Characteristics: Composed of shavings of cortical bone removed during osteoplasty and ostectomy from intraoral sites.
   • Challenges: Larger particle sizes can complicate placement and handling, and there is a potential for sequestration. This method has largely been replaced by autogenous osseous coagulum and bone blend.

2. Osseous Coagulum and Bone Blend

   • Technique: Intraoral bone is obtained using high- or low-speed round burs and mixed with blood to form an osseous coagulum (Robinson, 1969).
   • Advantages: Overcomes disadvantages of cortical bone chips, such as inability to aspirate during collection and variability in quality and quantity of collected bone.
   • Applications: Used in various periodontal procedures to enhance healing and regeneration.

3. Intraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Healing bony wounds, extraction sockets, edentulous ridges, mandibular retromolar areas, and maxillary tuberosity.
   • Applications: Provides a rich source of osteogenic cells and growth factors for bone regeneration.

4. Extraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Obtained from the anterior or posterior iliac crest.
   • Advantages: Generally offers the greatest potential for new bone growth due to the abundance of cancellous bone and marrow.

B. Bone Allografts

Bone allografts are harvested from donors and can be classified into three main types:

1. Undermineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)

   • Introduction: Introduced in 1976 by Mellonig et al.
   • Process: Freeze drying removes approximately 95% of the water from bone, preserving morphology, solubility, and chemical integrity while reducing antigenicity.
   • Efficacy: FDBA combined with autogenous bone is more effective than FDBA alone, particularly in treating furcation involvements.

2. Demineralized (Decalcified) FDBA

   • Mechanism: Demineralization enhances osteogenic potential by exposing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in the bone matrix.
   • Osteoinduction vs. Osteoconduction: Demineralized grafts induce new bone formation (osteoinduction), while undermineralized allografts facilitate bone growth by providing a scaffold (osteoconduction).

3. Frozen Iliac Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Usage: Used sparingly due to variability in outcomes and potential complications.

Comparison of Allografts and Alloplasts

• Clinical Outcomes: Both FDBA and DFDBA have been compared to porous particulate hydroxyapatite, showing little difference in post-treatment clinical parameters.
• Histological Healing: Grafts of DFDBA typically heal with regeneration of the periodontium, while synthetic bone grafts (alloplasts) heal by repair, which may not restore the original periodontal architecture.

Classification of Embrasures

1. Type I Embrasures:

   • Description: These are characterized by the presence of interdental papillae that completely fill the embrasure space, with no gingival recession.
   • Recommended Cleaning Device:
     • Dental Floss: Dental floss is most effective in cleaning Type I embrasures. It can effectively remove plaque and debris from the tight spaces between teeth.

2. Type II Embrasures:

   • Description: These embrasures have larger spaces due to some loss of attachment, but the interdental papillae are still present.
   • Recommended Cleaning Device:
     • Interproximal Brush: For Type II embrasures, interproximal brushes are recommended. These brushes have bristles that can effectively clean around the exposed root surfaces and between teeth, providing better plaque removal than dental floss in these larger spaces.

3. Type III Embrasures:

   • Description: These spaces occur when there is significant loss of attachment, resulting in the absence of interdental papillae.
   • Recommended Cleaning Device:
     • Single Tufted Brushes: Single tufted brushes (also known as end-tuft brushes) are ideal for cleaning Type III embrasures. They can reach areas that are difficult to access with traditional floss or brushes, effectively cleaning the exposed root surfaces and the surrounding areas.

Keratinized Gingiva and Attached Gingiva

The gingiva is an essential component of the periodontal tissues, providing support and protection for the teeth. Understanding the characteristics of keratinized gingiva, particularly attached gingiva, is crucial for assessing periodontal health.

Keratinized Gingiva

1. Definition:

   • Keratinized gingiva refers to the gingival tissue that is covered by a layer of keratinized epithelium, providing a protective barrier against mechanical and microbial insults.

2. Areas of Keratinized Gingiva:

   • Attached Gingiva:
     • Extends from the gingival groove to the mucogingival junction.
   • Marginal Gingiva:
     • The free gingival margin that surrounds the teeth.
   • Hard Palate:
     • The roof of the mouth, which is also covered by keratinized tissue.

Attached Gingiva

1. Location:

   • The attached gingiva is the portion of the gingiva that is firmly bound to the underlying alveolar bone.

2. Width of Attached Gingiva:

   • The width of attached gingiva varies based on location and can increase with age and in cases of supraerupted teeth.

3. Measurements:

   • Greatest Width:
     • Found in the incisor region:
       • Maxilla: 3.5 mm - 4.5 mm
       • Mandible: 3.3 mm - 3.9 mm
   • Narrowest Width:
     • Found in the posterior region:
       • Maxillary First Premolar: 1.9 mm
       • Mandibular First Premolar: 1.8 mm

Clinical Significance

• Importance of Attached Gingiva:

  • The width of attached gingiva is important for periodontal health, as it provides a buffer zone against mechanical forces and helps maintain the integrity of the periodontal attachment.
  • Insufficient attached gingiva may lead to increased susceptibility to periodontal disease and gingival recession.

• Assessment:

  • Regular assessment of the width of attached gingiva is essential during periodontal examinations to identify potential areas of concern and to plan appropriate treatment strategies.

Assessing New Attachment in Periodontal Therapy

Assessing new attachment following periodontal therapy is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and understanding the healing process. However, various methods of assessment have limitations that must be considered. This lecture will discuss the reliability of different assessment methods for new attachment, including periodontal probing, radiographic analysis, and histologic methods.

1. Periodontal Probing

• Assessment Method: Periodontal probing is commonly used to measure probing depth and attachment levels before and after therapy.

• Limitations:

  • Coronal Positioning of Probe Tip: After therapy, when the inflammatory lesion is resolved, the probe tip may stop coronal to the apical termination of the epithelium. This can lead to misleading interpretations of attachment gain.
  • Infrabony Defects: Following treatment of infrabony defects, new bone may form so close to the tooth surface that the probe cannot penetrate. This can result in a false impression of improved attachment levels.
  • Interpretation of Results: A gain in probing attachment level does not necessarily indicate a true gain of connective tissue attachment. Instead, it may reflect improved health of the surrounding tissues, which increases resistance to probe penetration.

2. Radiographic Analysis and Reentry Operations

• Assessment Method: Radiographic analysis involves comparing radiographs taken before and after therapy to evaluate changes in bone levels. Reentry operations allow for direct inspection of the treated area.

• Limitations:

  • Bone Fill vs. New Attachment: While radiographs can provide evidence of new bone formation (bone fill), they do not document the formation of new root cementum or a new periodontal ligament. Therefore, radiographic evidence alone cannot confirm the establishment of new attachment.

3. Histologic Methods

• Assessment Method: Histologic analysis involves examining tissue samples under a microscope to assess the formation of new attachment, including new cementum and periodontal ligament.

• Advantages:

  • Validity: Histologic methods are considered the only valid approach to assess the formation of new attachment accurately.

• Limitations:

  • Pre-Therapy Assessment: Accurate assessment of the attachment level prior to therapy is essential for histologic analysis. If the initial attachment level cannot be determined with certainty, it may compromise the validity of the findings.