Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal and dental surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues. Various materials can be used for bone grafting, each with unique properties and applications.

A. Osseous Coagulum

• Composition: Osseous coagulum is a mixture of bone dust and blood. It is created using small particles ground from cortical bone.
• Sources: Bone dust can be obtained from various anatomical sites, including:
  • Lingual ridge of the mandible
  • Exostoses
  • Edentulous ridges
  • Bone distal to terminal teeth
• Application: This material is used in periodontal surgery to promote healing and regeneration of bone in areas affected by periodontal disease.

B. Bioactive Glass

• Composition: Bioactive glass consists of sodium and calcium salts, phosphates, and silicon dioxide.
• Function: It promotes bone regeneration by forming a bond with surrounding bone and stimulating cellular activity.

C. HTR Polymer

• Composition: HTR Polymer is a non-resorbable, microporous, biocompatible composite made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polyhydroxymethacrylate.
• Application: This material is used in various dental and periodontal applications due to its biocompatibility and structural properties.

D. Other Bone Graft Materials

• Sclera: Used as a graft material due to its collagen content and biocompatibility.
• Cartilage: Can be used in certain grafting procedures, particularly in reconstructive surgery.
• Plaster of Paris: Occasionally used in bone grafting, though less common due to its non-biological nature.
• Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials: These materials are osteoconductive and promote bone healing.
• Coral-Derived Materials: Natural coral can be processed to create a scaffold for bone regeneration.

Dark Field Microscopy in Periodontal Microbiology

Dark field microscopy and phase contrast microscopy are valuable techniques in microbiological studies, particularly in the field of periodontal research. These methods allow for the direct observation of bacteria in plaque samples, providing insights into their morphology and motility. This lecture will discuss the principles of dark field microscopy, its applications in periodontal disease assessment, and its limitations.

Dark Field Microscopy

• Definition: Dark field microscopy is a technique that enhances the contrast of unstained, transparent specimens, allowing for the visualization of live microorganisms in their natural state.
• Principle: The method uses a special condenser that directs light at an angle, creating a dark background against which the specimen appears bright. This allows for the observation of motility and morphology without the need for staining.

Applications in Periodontal Microbiology

1. Alternative to Culture Methods:

   • Dark field microscopy has been suggested as a rapid alternative to traditional culture methods for assessing bacterial populations in periodontal plaque samples. It allows for immediate observation of bacteria without the time-consuming process of culturing.

2. Assessment of Morphology and Motility:

   • The technique enables direct and rapid assessment of the morphology (shape and structure) and motility (movement) of bacteria present in plaque samples. This information can be crucial for understanding the dynamics of periodontal disease.

3. Indication of Periodontal Disease Status:

   • Dark field microscopy has been used to indicate the status of periodontal disease and the effectiveness of maintenance programs. By observing the presence and activity of specific bacteria, clinicians can gain insights into the health of periodontal tissues.

Limitations of Dark Field Microscopy

1. Analysis of Major Periodontal Pathogens:

   • While dark field microscopy can visualize motile bacteria, it is important to note that many major periodontal pathogens, such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Eikenella corrodens, and Eubacterium species, are motile. However, the technique may not provide detailed information about their specific characteristics or pathogenic potential.

2. Differentiation of Treponema Species:

   • Dark field microscopy cannot differentiate between species of Treponema, which is a limitation when identifying specific pathogens associated with periodontal disease. This lack of specificity can hinder the ability to tailor treatment based on the exact microbial profile.

3. Limited Quantitative Analysis:

   • While dark field microscopy allows for qualitative observations, it may not provide quantitative data on bacterial populations, which can be important for assessing disease severity and treatment outcomes.

Effects of Smoking on the Etiology and Pathogenesis of Periodontal Disease

Smoking is a significant risk factor for the development and progression of periodontal disease. It affects various aspects of periodontal health, including microbiology, immunology, and physiology. Understanding these effects is crucial for dental professionals in managing patients with periodontal disease, particularly those who smoke.

Etiologic Factors and the Impact of Smoking

1. Microbiology

   • Plaque Accumulation:
     • Smoking does not affect the rate of plaque accumulation on teeth. This means that smokers may have similar levels of plaque as non-smokers.
   • Colonization of Periodontal Pathogens:
     • Smoking increases the colonization of shallow periodontal pockets by periodontal pathogens. This can lead to an increased risk of periodontal disease.
     • There are higher levels of periodontal pathogens found in deep periodontal pockets among smokers, contributing to the severity of periodontal disease.

2. Immunology

   • Neutrophil Function:
     • Smoking alters neutrophil chemotaxis (the movement of neutrophils towards infection), phagocytosis (the process by which neutrophils engulf and destroy pathogens), and the oxidative burst (the rapid release of reactive oxygen species to kill bacteria).
   • Cytokine Levels:
     • Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) are found in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of smokers. These cytokines play a role in inflammation and tissue destruction.
   • Collagenase and Elastase Production:
     • There is an increase in neutrophil collagenase and elastase in GCF, which can contribute to the breakdown of connective tissue and exacerbate periodontal tissue destruction.
   • Monocyte Response:
     • Smoking enhances the production of PGE2 by monocytes in response to lipopolysaccharides (LPS), further promoting inflammation and tissue damage.

3. Physiology

   • Gingival Blood Vessels:
     • Smoking leads to a decrease in gingival blood vessels, which can impair the delivery of immune cells and nutrients to the periodontal tissues, exacerbating inflammation.
   • Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) Flow:
     • There is a reduction in GCF flow and bleeding on probing, even in the presence of increased inflammation. This can mask the clinical signs of periodontal disease, making diagnosis more challenging.
   • Subgingival Temperature:
     • Smoking is associated with a decrease in subgingival temperature, which may affect the metabolic activity of periodontal pathogens.
   • Recovery from Local Anesthesia:
     • Smokers may require a longer time to recover from local anesthesia, which can complicate dental procedures and patient management.

Clinical Implications

1. Increased Risk of Periodontal Disease:

   • Smokers are at a higher risk for developing periodontal disease due to the combined effects of altered microbial colonization, impaired immune response, and physiological changes in the gingival tissues.

2. Challenges in Diagnosis:

   • The reduced bleeding on probing and altered GCF flow in smokers can lead to underdiagnosis or misdiagnosis of periodontal disease. Dental professionals must be vigilant in assessing periodontal health in smokers.

3. Treatment Considerations:

   • Smoking cessation should be a key component of periodontal treatment plans. Educating patients about the effects of smoking on periodontal health can motivate them to quit.
   • Treatment may need to be more aggressive in smokers due to the increased severity of periodontal disease and the altered healing response.

4. Monitoring and Maintenance:

   • Regular monitoring of periodontal health is essential for smokers, as they may experience more rapid disease progression. Tailored maintenance programs should be implemented to address their specific needs.

Sutures for Periodontal Flaps

Suturing is a critical aspect of periodontal surgery, particularly when managing periodontal flaps. The choice of suture material can significantly influence healing, tissue adaptation, and overall surgical outcomes.

1. Nonabsorbable Sutures

Nonabsorbable sutures are designed to remain in the tissue until they are manually removed. They are often used in situations where long-term support is needed.

A. Types of Nonabsorbable Sutures

1. Silk (Braided)

   • Characteristics:
     • Excellent handling properties and knot security.
     • Provides good tissue approximation.
   • Applications: Commonly used in periodontal surgeries due to its ease of use and reliability.

2. Nylon (Monofilament) (Ethilon)

   • Characteristics:
     • Strong and resistant to stretching.
     • Less tissue reactivity compared to silk.
   • Applications: Ideal for delicate tissues and areas requiring minimal tissue trauma.

3. ePTFE (Monofilament) (Gore-Tex)

   • Characteristics:
     • Biocompatible and non-reactive.
     • Excellent tensile strength and flexibility.
   • Applications: Often used in guided tissue regeneration procedures and in areas where long-term support is needed.

4. Polyester (Braided) (Ethibond)

   • Characteristics:
     • High tensile strength and good knot security.
     • Less pliable than silk.
   • Applications: Used in situations requiring strong sutures, such as in flap stabilization.

2. Absorbable Sutures

Absorbable sutures are designed to be broken down by the body over time, eliminating the need for removal. They are often used in periodontal surgeries where temporary support is sufficient.

A. Types of Absorbable Sutures

1. Surgical Gut

   • Plain Gut (Monofilament)

     • Absorption Time: Approximately 30 days.
     • Characteristics: Made from sheep or cow intestines; provides good tensile strength initially but loses strength quickly.
     • Applications: Suitable for soft tissue approximation where rapid absorption is desired.

   • Chromic Gut (Monofilament)

     • Absorption Time: Approximately 45 to 60 days.
     • Characteristics: Treated with chromium salts to delay absorption; retains strength longer than plain gut.
     • Applications: Used in areas where a longer healing time is expected.

2. Synthetic Absorbable Sutures

   • Polyglycolic Acid (Braided) (Vicryl, Ethicon)

     • Absorption Time: Approximately 16 to 20 days.
     • Characteristics: Provides good tensile strength and is absorbed predictably.
     • Applications: Commonly used in periodontal and oral surgeries due to its handling properties.

   • Dexon (Davis & Geck)

     • Characteristics: Similar to Vicryl; made from polyglycolic acid.
     • Applications: Used in soft tissue approximation and ligation.

   • Polyglycaprone (Monofilament) (Maxon)

     • Absorption Time: Similar to Vicryl.
     • Characteristics: Offers excellent tensile strength and is absorbed more slowly than other synthetic options.
     • Applications: Ideal for areas requiring longer support during healing.

Anatomy and Histology of the Periodontium

Gingiva (normal clinical appearance): no muscles, no glands; keratinized

• Color: coral pink but does vary with individuals and races due to cutaneous pigmentation
• Papillary contour: pyramidal shape with one F and one L papilla and the col filling interproximal space to the contact area (col the starting place gingivitis)
• Marginal contour: knife-edged and scalloped
• Texture: stippled (orange-peel texture); blow air to dry out and see where stippling ends to see end of gingiva
• Consistency: firm and resilient (push against it and won’t move); bound to underlying bone
• Sulcus depth: 0-3mm
• Exudate: no exudates (blood, pus, water)

  Anatomic and histological structures

Gingival unit: includes periodontium above alveolar crest of bone

a. Alveolar mucosa: histology- non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium, submucosa with glands, loose connective tissue with collagen and elastin, muscles.  No epithelial ridges, no stratum granulosum (flattened cells below keratin layer)

b. Mucogingival junction: clinical demarcation between alveolar mucosa and attached gingiva

c. Attached gingiva: histology- keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges (basal cell layer, prickle cell layer, granular cell layer (stratum granulosum), keratin layer); no submucosa

• Dense connective tissue: predominantly collagen, bound to periosteum of bone by Sharpey fibers
• Reticular fibers between collagen fibers and are continuous with reticulin in blood vessels

d. Free gingival groove: demarcation between attached and free gingiva; denotes base of gingival sulcus in normal gingiva; not always seen

e. Free gingival margin: area from free gingival groove to epithelial attachment (up and over ® inside)

• Oral surface: stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges
• Tooth side surface (sulcular epithelium): non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with no epithelial ridges (basal cell and prickle cell layers)

f. Gingival sulcus: space bounded by tooth surface, sulcular epithelium, and junctional epithelium; 0-3mm depth; space between epithelium and tooth

g. Dento-gingival junction: combination of epithelial and fibrous attachment

• Junctional epithelium (epithelial attachment): attachment of epithelial cells by hemi-desmosomes and sticky substances (basal lamina- 800-1200 A, DAS-acid mucopolysaccharides, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate A, C, and B), to enamel, enamel and cementum, or cementum depending on stage of passive eruption.  Length ranges from 0.25-1.35mm.
• Fibrous attachment: attachment of collagen fibers (Sharpey’s fibers) into cementum just beneath epithelial attachment; ~ 1mm thick

h. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated (for pain) in connective tissue.  Both free and specialized endings for pain, touch pressure, and temperature -> proprioception.  If dentures, rely on TMJ.

i.Mesh of terminal argyophilic fibers (stain silver), some extending into epithelium

ii  Meissner-type corpuscles: pressure sensitive sensory nerve encased in CT

iii.Krause-type corpuscles: temperature receptors

iv. Encapsulated spindles

i. Gingival fibers:

i.  Gingivodental group:

• Group I (A): from cementum to free gingival margin
• Group II (B): from cementum to attached gingiva
• Group III (C): from cementum over alveolar crest to periosteum on buccal and lingual plates

ii.  Circular (ligamentum circularis): encircles tooth in free gingiva

iii. Transeptal fibers: connects cementum of adjacent teeth, runs over interdental septum of alveolar bone.  Separates gingival unit from attachment apparatus.

Transeptal and Group III fibers the major defense against stuff getting into bone and ligament.

2.  Attachment apparatus: periodontium below alveolar crest of bone

Periodontal ligament: Sharpey’s fibers (collagen) connecting cementum to bone (bundle bone).  Few elastic and oxytalan fibers associated with blood vessels and embedded in cementum in cervical third of tooth.  Components divided as follows:

i. Alveolar crest fibers: from cementum just below CEJ apical to alveolar crest of bone

ii.Horizontal fibers: just apical to alveolar crest group, run at right angles to long axis of tooth from cementum horizontally to alveolar bone proper

iii.Oblique fibers: most numerous, from cementum run coronally to alveolar bone proper

iv. Apical fibers: radiate from cementum around apex of root apically to alveolar bone proper, form socket base

v. Interradicular fibers: found only between roots of multi-rooted teeth from cementum to alveolar bone proper

vi. Intermediate plexus: fibers which splice Sharpey’s fibers from bone and cementum

vii. Epithelial Rests of Malassez: cluster and individual epithelial cells close to cementum which are remnants of Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath; potential source of periodontal cysts.

viii. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated; abundant supply of sensory free nerve endings capable of transmitting tactile pressure and pain sensation by trigeminal pathway and elongated spindle-like nerve fiber for proprioceptive impulses

Cementum: 45-50% inorganic; 50-55% organic (enamel is 97% inorganic; dentin 70% inorganic)

i.  Acellular cementum: no cementocytes; covers dentin (older) in coronal ½ to 2/3 of root, 16-60 mm thick

ii. Cellular cementum: cementocytes; covers dentin in apical ½ to 1/3 of root; also may cover acellular cementum areas in repair areas, 15-200 mm thick

iii. Precementum (cementoid): meshwork of irregularly arranged collagen in surface of cementum where formation starts

iv. Cemento-enamel junction (CEJ): 60-65% of time cementum overlaps enamel; 30% meet end-to-end; 5-10% space between

v. Cementum slower healing than bone or PDL.  If expose dentinotubules ® root sensitivity.

Alveolar bone: 65% inorganic, 35% organic

i. Alveolar bone proper (cribriform plate): lamina dura on x-ray; bundle bone receive Sharpey fibers from PDL

ii. Supporting bone: cancellous, trabecular (vascularized) and F and L plates of compact bone

Blood supply to periodontium

i. Alveolar blood vessels (inferior and superior)

A) Interalveolar: actually runs through bone then exits, main supply to alveolar bone and PDL

B) Supraperiosteal: just outside bone, to gingiva and alveolar bone

C) Dental (pulpal): to pulp and periapical area

D) Terminal vessels (supracrestal): anastomose of A and B above beneath the sulcular epithelium

E) PDL gets blood from: most from branches of interalveolar blood vessels from alveolar bone marrow spaces, supraperiosteal vessels when interalveolar vessels not present, pulpal (apical) vessels, supracrestal gingival vessels

ii. Lymphatic drainage: accompany blood vessels to regional lymph nodes (esp. submaxillary group)

Assessing New Attachment in Periodontal Therapy

Assessing new attachment following periodontal therapy is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and understanding the healing process. However, various methods of assessment have limitations that must be considered. This lecture will discuss the reliability of different assessment methods for new attachment, including periodontal probing, radiographic analysis, and histologic methods.

1. Periodontal Probing

• Assessment Method: Periodontal probing is commonly used to measure probing depth and attachment levels before and after therapy.

• Limitations:

  • Coronal Positioning of Probe Tip: After therapy, when the inflammatory lesion is resolved, the probe tip may stop coronal to the apical termination of the epithelium. This can lead to misleading interpretations of attachment gain.
  • Infrabony Defects: Following treatment of infrabony defects, new bone may form so close to the tooth surface that the probe cannot penetrate. This can result in a false impression of improved attachment levels.
  • Interpretation of Results: A gain in probing attachment level does not necessarily indicate a true gain of connective tissue attachment. Instead, it may reflect improved health of the surrounding tissues, which increases resistance to probe penetration.

2. Radiographic Analysis and Reentry Operations

• Assessment Method: Radiographic analysis involves comparing radiographs taken before and after therapy to evaluate changes in bone levels. Reentry operations allow for direct inspection of the treated area.

• Limitations:

  • Bone Fill vs. New Attachment: While radiographs can provide evidence of new bone formation (bone fill), they do not document the formation of new root cementum or a new periodontal ligament. Therefore, radiographic evidence alone cannot confirm the establishment of new attachment.

3. Histologic Methods

• Assessment Method: Histologic analysis involves examining tissue samples under a microscope to assess the formation of new attachment, including new cementum and periodontal ligament.

• Advantages:

  • Validity: Histologic methods are considered the only valid approach to assess the formation of new attachment accurately.

• Limitations:

  • Pre-Therapy Assessment: Accurate assessment of the attachment level prior to therapy is essential for histologic analysis. If the initial attachment level cannot be determined with certainty, it may compromise the validity of the findings.