Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG)

Necrotizing Ulcerative Gingivitis (NUG), also known as Vincent's disease or trench mouth, is a severe form of periodontal disease characterized by the sudden onset of symptoms and specific clinical features.

Etiology and Predisposing Factors

• Sudden Onset: NUG is characterized by a rapid onset of symptoms, often following debilitating diseases or acute respiratory infections.
• Lifestyle Factors: Changes in living habits, such as prolonged work without adequate rest, poor nutrition, tobacco use, and psychological stress, are frequently noted in patient histories .
• Smoking: Smoking has been identified as a significant predisposing factor for NUG/NDP .
• Immune Compromise: Conditions that compromise the immune system, such as poor oral hygiene, smoking, and emotional stress, are major contributors to the development of NUG .

Clinical Presentation

• Symptoms: NUG presents with:
  • Punched-out, crater-like depressions at the crest of interdental papillae.
  • Marginal gingival involvement, with rare extension to attached gingiva and oral mucosa.
  • Grey, pseudomembranous slough covering the lesions.
  • Spontaneous bleeding upon slight stimulation of the gingiva.
  • Fetid odor and increased salivation.

Microbiology

• Mixed Bacterial Infection: NUG is caused by a complex of anaerobic bacteria, often referred to as the fusospirochetal complex, which includes:
  • Treponema vincentii
  • Treponema denticola
  • Treponema macrodentium
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum
  • Prevotella intermedia
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis

Treatment

1. Control of Acute Phase:

   • Clean the wound with an antibacterial agent.
   • Irrigate the lesion with warm water and 5% vol/vol hydrogen peroxide.
   • Prescribe oxygen-releasing mouthwash (e.g., hydrogen peroxide DPF, sodium perborate DPF) to be used thrice daily.
   • Administer oral metronidazole for 3 to 5 days. If sensitive to metronidazole, prescribe penicillin; if sensitive to both, consider erythromycin or clindamycin.
   • Use 2% chlorhexidine in select cases for a short duration.

2. Management of Residual Condition:

   • Remove predisposing local factors (e.g., overhangs).
   • Perform supra- and subgingival scaling.
   • Consider gingivoplasty to correct any residual gingival deformities.

Changes in Plaque pH After Sucrose Rinse

The pH of dental plaque is a critical factor in the development of dental caries and periodontal disease. Key findings from various studies that investigated the changes in plaque pH following carbohydrate rinses, particularly focusing on sucrose and glucose.

Key Findings from Studies

1. Monitoring Plaque pH Changes:

   • A study reported that changes in plaque pH after a sucrose rinse were monitored using plaque sampling, antimony and glass electrodes, and telemetry.
   • Results:
     • The minimum pH at approximal sites (areas between teeth) was approximately 0.7 pH units lower than that on buccal surfaces (outer surfaces of the teeth).
     • The pH at the approximal site remained below resting levels for over 120 minutes.
     • The area under the pH response curves from approximal sites was five times greater than that from buccal surfaces, indicating a more significant and prolonged acidogenic response in interproximal areas.

2. Stephan's Early Studies (1935):

   • Method: Colorimetric measurement of plaque pH suspended in water.
   • Findings:
     • The pH of 211 plaque samples ranged from 4.6 to 7.0.
     • The mean pH value was found to be 5.9, indicating a generally acidic environment in dental plaque.

3. Stephan's Follow-Up Studies (1940):

   • Method: Use of an antimony electrode to measure in situ plaque pH after rinsing with sugar solutions.
   • Findings:
     • A 10% solution of glucose or sucrose caused a rapid drop in plaque pH by about 2 units within 2 to 5 minutes, reaching values between 4.5 and 5.0.
     • A 1% lactose solution lowered the pH by 0.3 units, while a 1% glucose solution caused a drop of 1.5 units.
     • A 1% boiled starch solution resulted in a reduction of 1.5 pH units over 51 minutes.
     • In all cases, the pH tended to return to initial values within approximately 2 hours.

4. Investigation of Proximal Cavities:

   • Studies of actual proximal cavities opened mechanically showed that the lowest pH values ranged from 4.6 to 4.1.
   • After rinsing with a 10% glucose or sucrose solution, the pH in the plaque dropped to between 4.5 and 5.0 within 2 to 5 minutes and gradually returned to baseline levels within 1 to 2 hours.

Implications

• The studies highlight the significant impact of carbohydrate exposure, particularly sucrose and glucose, on the pH of dental plaque.
• The rapid drop in pH following carbohydrate rinses indicates an acidogenic response from plaque microorganisms, which can contribute to enamel demineralization and caries development.
• The prolonged acidic environment in approximal sites suggests that these areas may be more susceptible to caries due to the slower recovery of pH levels.

Aggressive Periodontitis (formerly Juvenile Periodontitis)

• Historical Names: Previously referred to as periodontosis, deep cementopathia, diseases of eruption, Gottleib’s diseases, and periodontitis marginalis progressive.
• Risk Factors:
  • High frequency of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans.
  • Immune defects (functional defects of PMNs and monocytes).
  • Autoimmunity and genetic factors.
  • Environmental factors, including smoking.
• Clinical Features:
  • Vertical loss of alveolar bone around the first molars and incisors, typically beginning around puberty.
  • Bone loss patterns often described as "target" or "bull" shaped lesions.

Periodontal Bone Grafts

Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues.

1. Bone Blend

 Bone blend is a mixture of cortical or cancellous bone that is procured using a trephine or rongeurs, placed in an amalgam capsule, and triturated to achieve a slushy osseous mass. This technique allows for the creation of smaller particle sizes, which enhances resorption and replacement with host bone.

Particle Size: The ideal particle size for bone blend is approximately 210 x 105 micrometers.

Rationale: Smaller particle sizes improve the chances of resorption and integration with the host bone, making the graft more effective.

2. Types of Periodontal Bone Grafts

A. Autogenous Grafts

Autogenous grafts are harvested from the patient’s own body, providing the best compatibility and healing potential.

1. Cortical Bone Chips

   • History: First used by Nabers and O'Leary in 1965.
   • Characteristics: Composed of shavings of cortical bone removed during osteoplasty and ostectomy from intraoral sites.
   • Challenges: Larger particle sizes can complicate placement and handling, and there is a potential for sequestration. This method has largely been replaced by autogenous osseous coagulum and bone blend.

2. Osseous Coagulum and Bone Blend

   • Technique: Intraoral bone is obtained using high- or low-speed round burs and mixed with blood to form an osseous coagulum (Robinson, 1969).
   • Advantages: Overcomes disadvantages of cortical bone chips, such as inability to aspirate during collection and variability in quality and quantity of collected bone.
   • Applications: Used in various periodontal procedures to enhance healing and regeneration.

3. Intraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Healing bony wounds, extraction sockets, edentulous ridges, mandibular retromolar areas, and maxillary tuberosity.
   • Applications: Provides a rich source of osteogenic cells and growth factors for bone regeneration.

4. Extraoral Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Sources: Obtained from the anterior or posterior iliac crest.
   • Advantages: Generally offers the greatest potential for new bone growth due to the abundance of cancellous bone and marrow.

B. Bone Allografts

Bone allografts are harvested from donors and can be classified into three main types:

1. Undermineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA)

   • Introduction: Introduced in 1976 by Mellonig et al.
   • Process: Freeze drying removes approximately 95% of the water from bone, preserving morphology, solubility, and chemical integrity while reducing antigenicity.
   • Efficacy: FDBA combined with autogenous bone is more effective than FDBA alone, particularly in treating furcation involvements.

2. Demineralized (Decalcified) FDBA

   • Mechanism: Demineralization enhances osteogenic potential by exposing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in the bone matrix.
   • Osteoinduction vs. Osteoconduction: Demineralized grafts induce new bone formation (osteoinduction), while undermineralized allografts facilitate bone growth by providing a scaffold (osteoconduction).

3. Frozen Iliac Cancellous Bone and Marrow

   • Usage: Used sparingly due to variability in outcomes and potential complications.

Comparison of Allografts and Alloplasts

• Clinical Outcomes: Both FDBA and DFDBA have been compared to porous particulate hydroxyapatite, showing little difference in post-treatment clinical parameters.
• Histological Healing: Grafts of DFDBA typically heal with regeneration of the periodontium, while synthetic bone grafts (alloplasts) heal by repair, which may not restore the original periodontal architecture.

Ecological Succession of Biofilm in Dental Plaque

Overview of Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation on tooth surfaces is a dynamic process characterized by ecological succession, where microbial communities evolve over time. This process transitions from an early aerobic environment dominated by gram-positive facultative species to a later stage characterized by a highly oxygen-deprived environment where gram-negative anaerobic microorganisms predominate.

Stages of Biofilm Development

1. Initial Colonization:

   • Environment: The initial phase occurs in an aerobic environment.
   • Primary Colonizers:
     • The first bacteria to colonize the pellicle-coated tooth surface are predominantly gram-positive facultative microorganisms.
     • Key Species:
       • Actinomyces viscosus
       • Streptococcus sanguis
   • Characteristics:
     • These bacteria can thrive in the presence of oxygen and play a crucial role in the establishment of the biofilm.

2. Secondary Colonization:

   • Environment: As the biofilm matures, the environment becomes increasingly anaerobic due to the metabolic activities of the initial colonizers.
   • Secondary Colonizers:
     • These microorganisms do not initially colonize clean tooth surfaces but adhere to the existing bacterial cells in the plaque mass.
     • Key Species:
       • Prevotella intermedia
       • Prevotella loescheii
       • Capnocytophaga spp.
       • Fusobacterium nucleatum
       • Porphyromonas gingivalis
   • Coaggregation:
     • Secondary colonizers adhere to primary colonizers through a process known as coaggregation, which involves specific interactions between bacterial cells.

3. Coaggregation Examples:

   • Coaggregation is a critical mechanism that facilitates the establishment of complex microbial communities within the biofilm.
   • Well-Known Examples:
     • Fusobacterium nucleatum with Streptococcus sanguis
     • Prevotella loescheii with Actinomyces viscosus
     • Capnocytophaga ochracea with Actinomyces viscosus

Implications of Ecological Succession

• Microbial Diversity: The transition from gram-positive to gram-negative organisms reflects an increase in microbial diversity and complexity within the biofilm.
• Pathogenic Potential: The accumulation of anaerobic gram-negative bacteria is associated with the development of periodontal diseases, as these organisms can produce virulence factors that contribute to tissue destruction and inflammation.
• Biofilm Stability: The interactions between different bacterial species through coaggregation enhance the stability and resilience of the biofilm, making it more challenging to remove through mechanical cleaning.

----------------------------------------------- 

Subgingival and Supragingival Calculus

Overview of Calculus Formation

Calculus, or tartar, is a hardened form of dental plaque that can form on both supragingival (above the gum line) and subgingival (below the gum line) surfaces. Understanding the differences between these two types of calculus is essential for effective periodontal disease management.

Subgingival Calculus

1. Color and Composition:

   • Appearance: Subgingival calculus is typically dark green or dark brown in color.
   • Causes of Color:
     • The dark color is likely due to the presence of matrix components that differ from those found in supragingival calculus.
     • It is influenced by iron heme pigments that are associated with the bleeding of inflamed gingiva, reflecting the inflammatory state of the periodontal tissues.

2. Formation Factors:

   • Matrix Components: The subgingival calculus matrix contains blood products, which contribute to its darker coloration.
   • Bacterial Environment: The subgingival environment is typically more anaerobic and harbors different bacterial species compared to supragingival calculus.

Supragingival Calculus

1. Formation Factors:

   • Dependence on Plaque and Saliva:
     • The degree of supragingival calculus formation is primarily influenced by the amount of bacterial plaque present and the secretion of salivary glands.
     • Increased plaque accumulation leads to greater calculus formation.

2. Inorganic Components:

   • Source: The inorganic components of supragingival calculus are mainly derived from saliva.
   • Composition: These components include minerals such as calcium and phosphate, which contribute to the calcification process of plaque.

Comparison of Inorganic Components

• Supragingival Calculus:

  • Inorganic components are primarily sourced from saliva, which contains minerals that facilitate the formation of calculus on the tooth surface.

• Subgingival Calculus:

  • In contrast, the inorganic components of subgingival calculus are derived mainly from crevicular fluid (serum transudate), which seeps into the gingival sulcus and contains various proteins and minerals from the bloodstream.

Bone grafting is a critical procedure in periodontal and dental surgery, aimed at restoring lost bone and supporting the regeneration of periodontal tissues. Various materials can be used for bone grafting, each with unique properties and applications.

A. Osseous Coagulum

• Composition: Osseous coagulum is a mixture of bone dust and blood. It is created using small particles ground from cortical bone.
• Sources: Bone dust can be obtained from various anatomical sites, including:
  • Lingual ridge of the mandible
  • Exostoses
  • Edentulous ridges
  • Bone distal to terminal teeth
• Application: This material is used in periodontal surgery to promote healing and regeneration of bone in areas affected by periodontal disease.

B. Bioactive Glass

• Composition: Bioactive glass consists of sodium and calcium salts, phosphates, and silicon dioxide.
• Function: It promotes bone regeneration by forming a bond with surrounding bone and stimulating cellular activity.

C. HTR Polymer

• Composition: HTR Polymer is a non-resorbable, microporous, biocompatible composite made from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polyhydroxymethacrylate.
• Application: This material is used in various dental and periodontal applications due to its biocompatibility and structural properties.

D. Other Bone Graft Materials

• Sclera: Used as a graft material due to its collagen content and biocompatibility.
• Cartilage: Can be used in certain grafting procedures, particularly in reconstructive surgery.
• Plaster of Paris: Occasionally used in bone grafting, though less common due to its non-biological nature.
• Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials: These materials are osteoconductive and promote bone healing.
• Coral-Derived Materials: Natural coral can be processed to create a scaffold for bone regeneration.