Modified Widman Flap Procedure

The modified Widman flap procedure is a surgical technique used in periodontal therapy to treat periodontal pockets while preserving the surrounding tissues and promoting healing. This lecture will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the modified Widman flap, its indications, and the procedural steps involved.

Advantages of the Modified Widman Flap Procedure

1. Intimate Postoperative Adaptation:

   • The main advantage of the modified Widman flap procedure is the ability to establish a close adaptation of healthy collagenous connective tissues and normal epithelium to all tooth surfaces. This promotes better healing and integration of tissues post-surgery

2. Feasibility for Bone Implantation:

   • The modified Widman flap procedure is advantageous over curettage, particularly when the implantation of bone and other substances is planned. This allows for better access and preparation of the surgical site for grafting .

3. Conservation of Bone and Optimal Coverage:

   • Compared to conventional reverse bevel flap surgery, the modified Widman flap conserves bone and provides optimal coverage of root surfaces by soft tissues. This results in:
     • A more aesthetically pleasing outcome.
     • A favorable environment for oral hygiene.
     • Potentially less root sensitivity and reduced risk of root caries.
     • More effective pocket closure compared to pocket elimination procedures .

4. Minimized Gingival Recession:

   • When reattachment or minimal gingival recession is desired, the modified Widman flap is preferred over subgingival curettage, making it a suitable choice for treating deeper pockets (greater than 5 mm) and other complex periodontal conditions.

Disadvantages of the Modified Widman Flap Procedure

1. Interproximal Architecture:
   • One apparent disadvantage is the potential for flat or concave interproximal architecture immediately following the removal of the surgical dressing, particularly in areas with interproximal bony craters. This can affect the aesthetic outcome and may require further management .

Indications for the Modified Widman Flap Procedure

• Deep Pockets: Pockets greater than 5 mm, especially in the anterior and buccal maxillary posterior regions.
• Intrabony Pockets and Craters: Effective for treating pockets with vertical bone loss.
• Furcation Involvement: Suitable for managing periodontal disease in multi-rooted teeth.
• Bone Grafts: Facilitates the placement of bone grafts during surgery.
• Severe Root Sensitivity: Indicated when root sensitivity is a significant concern.

Procedure Overview

1. Incisions and Flap Reflection:

   • Vertical Incisions: Made to access the periodontal pocket.
   • Crevicular Incision: A horizontal incision along the gingival margin.
   • Horizontal Incision: Undermines and removes the collar of tissue around the teeth.

2. Conservative Debridement:

   • Flap is reflected just beyond the alveolar crest.
   • Careful removal of all plaque and calculus while preserving the root surface.
   • Frequent sterile saline irrigation is used to maintain a clean surgical field.

3. Preservation of Proximal Bone Surface:

   • The proximal bone surface is preserved and not curetted, allowing for better healing and adaptation of the flap.
   • Exact flap adaptation is achieved with full coverage of the bone.

4. Suturing:

   • Suturing is aimed at achieving primary union of the proximal flap projections, ensuring proper healing and tissue integration.

Postoperative Care

• Antibiotic Ointment and Periodontal Dressing: Traditionally, antibiotic ointment was applied over sutures, and a periodontal dressing was placed. However, these practices are often omitted today.
• Current Recommendations: Patients are advised not to disturb the surgical area and to use a chlorhexidine mouth rinse every 12 hours for effective plaque control and to promote healing.

--------------

Neutrophil Disorders Associated with Periodontal Diseases

Neutrophils play a crucial role in the immune response, particularly in combating infections, including those associated with periodontal diseases. Various neutrophil disorders can significantly impact periodontal health, leading to increased susceptibility to periodontal diseases. This lecture will explore the relationship between neutrophil disorders and specific periodontal diseases.

Neutrophil Disorders

1. Diabetes Mellitus

   • Description: A metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels due to insulin resistance or deficiency.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: Diabetes can impair neutrophil function, including chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the oxidative burst, leading to an increased risk of periodontal infections.

2. Papillon-Lefevre Syndrome

   • Description: A rare genetic disorder characterized by palmoplantar keratoderma and severe periodontitis.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: Patients exhibit neutrophil dysfunction, leading to early onset and rapid progression of periodontal disease.

3. Down’s Syndrome

   • Description: A genetic disorder caused by the presence of an extra chromosome 21, leading to various developmental and health issues.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: Individuals with Down’s syndrome often have impaired neutrophil function, which contributes to an increased prevalence of periodontal disease.

4. Chediak-Higashi Syndrome

   • Description: A rare genetic disorder characterized by immunodeficiency, partial oculocutaneous albinism, and neurological problems.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: This syndrome results in defective neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis, leading to increased susceptibility to infections, including periodontal diseases.

5. Drug-Induced Agranulocytosis

   • Description: A condition characterized by a dangerously low level of neutrophils due to certain medications.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: The reduction in neutrophil count compromises the immune response, increasing the risk of periodontal infections.

6. Cyclic Neutropenia

   • Description: A rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of neutropenia (low neutrophil count) occurring every 21 days.
   • Impact on Neutrophils: During neutropenic episodes, patients are at a heightened risk for infections, including periodontal disease.

Periodontics: Dental specialty deals with the supporting and surrounding tissues of the teeth. 

1. Periodontium: tissues that invest and support teeth Includes Gingiva, Alveolar mucosa  Cementum, Periodontal ligament, Alveolar bone, Support bone

2. Periodontal disease: changes to periodontium beyond normal range of variation

a. Specific plaque hypothesis: specific microorganisms cause periodontal disease; mostly anaerobes. Three implicated: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Bacteriodes forsythus

b. Contributing factors: often a combination of factors

i. Local: calculus (tarter, home for bacteria, ­ with age), traumatic occlusal forces, caries (root caries), overhangs and over-contoured restorations, open contacts with food impaction, missing/malaligned teeth

Invasion of biological width: from free gingival margin -> attached gingiva need ~ 3 mm.  If enter this area -> problems (e.g., resorption)

ii. Host factors: exacerbate periodontal problems; e.g., smoking/tobacco use, pregnancy and puberty (hormonal changes, ­ blood vessel permeability), stress, poor diet

iii.Medications: often -> tissue overgrowth; e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, heart medicines, transplant anti-rejection drugs

iv.Systemic diseases: e.g., diabetes, immunosuppression

B. Gingivitis: inflammation of gingiva; ­ with age; generally reversible

C. Periodontitis: inflammation of supporting tissues of teeth, characterized by loss of attachment (PDL) and bone; generally irreversible

D.       Periodontal disease as risk factor for systemic diseases:

1.        Causes difficulty for diabetics to control blood sugar

2.        Pregnant women with periodontal disease ~ 7 times more likely to have premature and/or underweight baby

3.        Periodontal diseased patients may be at risk for heart disease

Assessing New Attachment in Periodontal Therapy

Assessing new attachment following periodontal therapy is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and understanding the healing process. However, various methods of assessment have limitations that must be considered. This lecture will discuss the reliability of different assessment methods for new attachment, including periodontal probing, radiographic analysis, and histologic methods.

1. Periodontal Probing

• Assessment Method: Periodontal probing is commonly used to measure probing depth and attachment levels before and after therapy.

• Limitations:

  • Coronal Positioning of Probe Tip: After therapy, when the inflammatory lesion is resolved, the probe tip may stop coronal to the apical termination of the epithelium. This can lead to misleading interpretations of attachment gain.
  • Infrabony Defects: Following treatment of infrabony defects, new bone may form so close to the tooth surface that the probe cannot penetrate. This can result in a false impression of improved attachment levels.
  • Interpretation of Results: A gain in probing attachment level does not necessarily indicate a true gain of connective tissue attachment. Instead, it may reflect improved health of the surrounding tissues, which increases resistance to probe penetration.

2. Radiographic Analysis and Reentry Operations

• Assessment Method: Radiographic analysis involves comparing radiographs taken before and after therapy to evaluate changes in bone levels. Reentry operations allow for direct inspection of the treated area.

• Limitations:

  • Bone Fill vs. New Attachment: While radiographs can provide evidence of new bone formation (bone fill), they do not document the formation of new root cementum or a new periodontal ligament. Therefore, radiographic evidence alone cannot confirm the establishment of new attachment.

3. Histologic Methods

• Assessment Method: Histologic analysis involves examining tissue samples under a microscope to assess the formation of new attachment, including new cementum and periodontal ligament.

• Advantages:

  • Validity: Histologic methods are considered the only valid approach to assess the formation of new attachment accurately.

• Limitations:

  • Pre-Therapy Assessment: Accurate assessment of the attachment level prior to therapy is essential for histologic analysis. If the initial attachment level cannot be determined with certainty, it may compromise the validity of the findings.

Microbes in Periodontics

Bacteria Associated with Periodontal Health

• Primary Species:

  • Gram-Positive Facultative Bacteria:
    • Streptococcus:
      • S. sanguis
      • S. mitis
      • A. viscosus
      • A. naeslundii
    • Actinomyces:
      • Beneficial for maintaining periodontal health.

• Protective or Beneficial Bacteria:

  • Key Species:
    • S. sanguis
    • Veillonella parvula
    • Corynebacterium ochracea
  • Characteristics:
    • Found in higher numbers at inactive periodontal sites (no attachment loss).
    • Low numbers at sites with active periodontal destruction.
    • Prevent colonization of pathogenic microorganisms (e.g., S. sanguis produces peroxide).

• Clinical Relevance:

  • High levels of C. ochracea and S. sanguis are associated with greater attachment gain post-therapy.

Microbiology of Chronic Plaque-Induced Gingivitis

• Composition:

  • Roughly equal proportions of:
    • Gram-Positive: 56%
    • Gram-Negative: 44%
    • Facultative: 59%
    • Anaerobic: 41%

• Predominant Gram-Positive Species:

  • S. sanguis
  • S. mitis
  • S. intermedius
  • S. oralis
  • A. viscosus
  • A. naeslundii
  • Peptostreptococcus micros

• Predominant Gram-Negative Species:

  • Fusobacterium nucleatum
  • Porphyromonas intermedia
  • Veillonella parvula
  • Haemophilus spp.
  • Capnocytophaga spp.
  • Campylobacter spp.

• Pregnancy-Associated Gingivitis:

  • Increased levels of steroid hormones and P. intermedia.

Chronic Periodontitis

• Key Microbial Species:

  • High levels of:
    • Porphyromonas gingivalis
    • Bacteroides forsythus
    • Porphyromonas intermedia
    • Campylobacter rectus
    • Eikenella corrodens
    • Fusobacterium nucleatum
    • Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans
    • Peptostreptococcus micros
    • Treponema spp.
    • Eubacterium spp.

• Pathogenic Mechanisms:

  • P. gingivalis and A. actinomycetemcomitans can invade host tissue cells.
  • Viruses such as Epstein-Barr Virus-1 (EBV-1) and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) may contribute to bone loss.

Localized Aggressive Periodontitis

• Microbiota Characteristics:
  • Predominantly gram-negative, capnophilic, and anaerobic rods.
  • Almost all localized juvenile periodontitis (LJP) sites harbor A. actinomycetemcomitans, which can comprise up to 90% of the total cultivable microbiota.

Anatomy and Histology of the Periodontium

Gingiva (normal clinical appearance): no muscles, no glands; keratinized

• Color: coral pink but does vary with individuals and races due to cutaneous pigmentation
• Papillary contour: pyramidal shape with one F and one L papilla and the col filling interproximal space to the contact area (col the starting place gingivitis)
• Marginal contour: knife-edged and scalloped
• Texture: stippled (orange-peel texture); blow air to dry out and see where stippling ends to see end of gingiva
• Consistency: firm and resilient (push against it and won’t move); bound to underlying bone
• Sulcus depth: 0-3mm
• Exudate: no exudates (blood, pus, water)

  Anatomic and histological structures

Gingival unit: includes periodontium above alveolar crest of bone

a. Alveolar mucosa: histology- non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium, submucosa with glands, loose connective tissue with collagen and elastin, muscles.  No epithelial ridges, no stratum granulosum (flattened cells below keratin layer)

b. Mucogingival junction: clinical demarcation between alveolar mucosa and attached gingiva

c. Attached gingiva: histology- keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges (basal cell layer, prickle cell layer, granular cell layer (stratum granulosum), keratin layer); no submucosa

• Dense connective tissue: predominantly collagen, bound to periosteum of bone by Sharpey fibers
• Reticular fibers between collagen fibers and are continuous with reticulin in blood vessels

d. Free gingival groove: demarcation between attached and free gingiva; denotes base of gingival sulcus in normal gingiva; not always seen

e. Free gingival margin: area from free gingival groove to epithelial attachment (up and over ® inside)

• Oral surface: stratified, squamous epithelium with epithelial ridges
• Tooth side surface (sulcular epithelium): non-keratinized, stratified, squamous epithelium with no epithelial ridges (basal cell and prickle cell layers)

f. Gingival sulcus: space bounded by tooth surface, sulcular epithelium, and junctional epithelium; 0-3mm depth; space between epithelium and tooth

g. Dento-gingival junction: combination of epithelial and fibrous attachment

• Junctional epithelium (epithelial attachment): attachment of epithelial cells by hemi-desmosomes and sticky substances (basal lamina- 800-1200 A, DAS-acid mucopolysaccharides, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate A, C, and B), to enamel, enamel and cementum, or cementum depending on stage of passive eruption.  Length ranges from 0.25-1.35mm.
• Fibrous attachment: attachment of collagen fibers (Sharpey’s fibers) into cementum just beneath epithelial attachment; ~ 1mm thick

h. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated (for pain) in connective tissue.  Both free and specialized endings for pain, touch pressure, and temperature -> proprioception.  If dentures, rely on TMJ.

i.Mesh of terminal argyophilic fibers (stain silver), some extending into epithelium

ii  Meissner-type corpuscles: pressure sensitive sensory nerve encased in CT

iii.Krause-type corpuscles: temperature receptors

iv. Encapsulated spindles

i. Gingival fibers:

i.  Gingivodental group:

• Group I (A): from cementum to free gingival margin
• Group II (B): from cementum to attached gingiva
• Group III (C): from cementum over alveolar crest to periosteum on buccal and lingual plates

ii.  Circular (ligamentum circularis): encircles tooth in free gingiva

iii. Transeptal fibers: connects cementum of adjacent teeth, runs over interdental septum of alveolar bone.  Separates gingival unit from attachment apparatus.

Transeptal and Group III fibers the major defense against stuff getting into bone and ligament.

2.  Attachment apparatus: periodontium below alveolar crest of bone

Periodontal ligament: Sharpey’s fibers (collagen) connecting cementum to bone (bundle bone).  Few elastic and oxytalan fibers associated with blood vessels and embedded in cementum in cervical third of tooth.  Components divided as follows:

i. Alveolar crest fibers: from cementum just below CEJ apical to alveolar crest of bone

ii.Horizontal fibers: just apical to alveolar crest group, run at right angles to long axis of tooth from cementum horizontally to alveolar bone proper

iii.Oblique fibers: most numerous, from cementum run coronally to alveolar bone proper

iv. Apical fibers: radiate from cementum around apex of root apically to alveolar bone proper, form socket base

v. Interradicular fibers: found only between roots of multi-rooted teeth from cementum to alveolar bone proper

vi. Intermediate plexus: fibers which splice Sharpey’s fibers from bone and cementum

vii. Epithelial Rests of Malassez: cluster and individual epithelial cells close to cementum which are remnants of Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath; potential source of periodontal cysts.

viii. Nerve fibers: myelinated and non-myelinated; abundant supply of sensory free nerve endings capable of transmitting tactile pressure and pain sensation by trigeminal pathway and elongated spindle-like nerve fiber for proprioceptive impulses

Cementum: 45-50% inorganic; 50-55% organic (enamel is 97% inorganic; dentin 70% inorganic)

i.  Acellular cementum: no cementocytes; covers dentin (older) in coronal ½ to 2/3 of root, 16-60 mm thick

ii. Cellular cementum: cementocytes; covers dentin in apical ½ to 1/3 of root; also may cover acellular cementum areas in repair areas, 15-200 mm thick

iii. Precementum (cementoid): meshwork of irregularly arranged collagen in surface of cementum where formation starts

iv. Cemento-enamel junction (CEJ): 60-65% of time cementum overlaps enamel; 30% meet end-to-end; 5-10% space between

v. Cementum slower healing than bone or PDL.  If expose dentinotubules ® root sensitivity.

Alveolar bone: 65% inorganic, 35% organic

i. Alveolar bone proper (cribriform plate): lamina dura on x-ray; bundle bone receive Sharpey fibers from PDL

ii. Supporting bone: cancellous, trabecular (vascularized) and F and L plates of compact bone

Blood supply to periodontium

i. Alveolar blood vessels (inferior and superior)

A) Interalveolar: actually runs through bone then exits, main supply to alveolar bone and PDL

B) Supraperiosteal: just outside bone, to gingiva and alveolar bone

C) Dental (pulpal): to pulp and periapical area

D) Terminal vessels (supracrestal): anastomose of A and B above beneath the sulcular epithelium

E) PDL gets blood from: most from branches of interalveolar blood vessels from alveolar bone marrow spaces, supraperiosteal vessels when interalveolar vessels not present, pulpal (apical) vessels, supracrestal gingival vessels

ii. Lymphatic drainage: accompany blood vessels to regional lymph nodes (esp. submaxillary group)

Aggressive periodontitis (AP) is a multifactorial, severe, and rapidly progressive form of periodontitis that primarily affects younger patients. It is characterized by a unique set of clinical and microbiological features that distinguish it from other forms of periodontal disease.

Key Characteristics

• Rapid Progression: AP is marked by a swift deterioration of periodontal tissues.
• Age Group: Primarily affects adolescents and young adults, but can occur at any age.
• Multifactorial Etiology: Involves a combination of microbiological, immunological, genetic, and environmental factors.

Other Findings

• Presence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.a.) in diseased sites.
• Abnormal host responses, including impaired phagocytosis and chemotaxis.
• Hyperresponsive macrophages leading to exaggerated inflammatory responses.
• The disease may exhibit self-arresting tendencies in some cases.

Classification

Aggressive periodontitis can be classified into two main types:

1. Localized Aggressive Periodontitis (LAP): Typically affects the permanent molars and incisors, often with localized attachment loss.
2. Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis (GAP): Involves more widespread periodontal tissue destruction.

Risk Factors

Microbiological Factors

• Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: A primary pathogen associated with LAP, producing a potent leukotoxin that kills neutrophils.
• Different strains of A.a. produce varying levels of leukotoxin, with highly toxic strains more prevalent in affected individuals.

Immunological Factors

• Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLAs): HLA-A9 and B-15 are candidate markers for aggressive periodontitis.
• Defective neutrophil function leads to impaired chemotaxis and phagocytosis.
• Hyper-responsive macrophage phenotype, characterized by elevated levels of PGE2 and IL-1β, may contribute to connective tissue breakdown and bone loss.

Genetic Factors

• Familial clustering of neutrophil abnormalities suggests a genetic predisposition.
• Genetic control of antibody responses to A.a., with variations in the ability to produce protective IgG2 antibodies.

Environmental Factors

• Smoking is a significant risk factor, with smokers experiencing more severe periodontal destruction compared to non-smokers.

Treatment Approaches

General Considerations

• Treatment strategies depend on the type and extent of periodontal destruction.
• GAP typically has a poorer prognosis compared to LAP, as it is less likely to enter spontaneous remission.

Conventional Periodontal Therapy

• Patient Education: Informing patients about the disease and its implications.
• Oral Hygiene Instructions: Reinforcing proper oral hygiene practices.
• Scaling and Root Planing: Removal of plaque and calculus to control local factors.

Surgical Resection Therapy

• Aimed at reducing or eliminating pocket depth.
• Contraindicated in cases of severe horizontal bone loss due to the risk of increased tooth mobility.

Regenerative Therapy

• Potential for regeneration is promising in AP cases.
• Techniques include open flap surgical debridement, root surface conditioning with tetracycline, and the use of allogenic bone grafts.
• Recent advances involve the use of enamel matrix proteins to promote cementum regeneration and new attachment.

Antimicrobial Therapy

• Often required as adjunctive treatment to eliminate A.a. from periodontal tissues.
• Tetracycline: Administered in various regimens to concentrate in periodontal tissues and inhibit A.a. growth.
• Combination Therapy: Metronidazole combined with amoxicillin has shown efficacy alongside periodontal therapy.
• Doxycycline: Used at a dose of 100 mg/day.
• Chlorhexidine (CHX): Irrigation and home rinsing to control bacterial load.

Host Modulation

• Involves the use of sub-antimicrobial dose doxycycline (SDD) to prevent periodontal attachment loss by modulating the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly collagenase and gelatinase.