Silk

• Composition: Natural protein fiber
• Structure: Braided
• Advantages: Excellent handling, superior knot security, cost-effective
• Disadvantages: Inflammatory response, bacterial adherence, gradual weakening
• Clinical uses: Oral surgery, temporary sutures requiring easy removal

Nylon (Polyamide)

• Structure: Monofilament or braided
• Advantages: High tensile strength, minimal tissue reaction
• Disadvantages: Difficult handling, poor knot security
• Clinical uses: Skin closure, situations requiring high strength

Polypropylene (Prolene)

• Structure: Monofilament
• Advantages: Chemically inert, minimal tissue reaction, maintains strength
• Disadvantages: Difficult handling, tendency to cut through tissues
• Clinical uses: Vascular surgery, situations requiring permanent support

Ridge Augmentation Procedures

Ridge augmentation procedures are surgical techniques used to increase the volume and density of the alveolar ridge in the maxilla and mandible. These procedures are often necessary to prepare the site for dental implants, especially in cases where there has been significant bone loss due to factors such as tooth extraction, periodontal disease, or trauma. Ridge augmentation can also be performed in conjunction with orthognathic surgery to enhance the overall facial structure and support dental rehabilitation.

Indications for Ridge Augmentation

• Insufficient Bone Volume: To provide adequate support for dental implants.
• Bone Resorption: Following tooth extraction or due to periodontal disease.
• Facial Aesthetics: To improve the contour of the jaw and facial profile.
• Orthognathic Surgery: To enhance the results of jaw repositioning procedures.

Types of Graft Materials Used

Ridge augmentation can be performed using various graft materials, which can be classified into the following categories:

1. Autografts:

   • Bone harvested from the patient’s own body, typically from intraoral sites (e.g., chin, ramus) or extraoral sites (e.g., iliac crest).
   • Advantages: High biocompatibility, osteogenic potential, and lower risk of rejection or infection.
   • Disadvantages: Additional surgical site, potential for increased morbidity, and limited availability.

2. Allografts:

   • Bone grafts obtained from a human donor (cadaveric bone) that have been processed and sterilized.
   • Advantages: No additional surgical site required, readily available, and can provide a scaffold for new bone growth.
   • Disadvantages: Risk of disease transmission and potential for immune response.

3. Xenografts:

   •  Bone grafts derived from a different species, commonly bovine (cow) bone.
   • Advantages: Biocompatible and provides a scaffold for bone regeneration.
   • Disadvantages: Potential for immune response and slower resorption compared to autografts.

4. Alloplasts:

   •  Synthetic materials used for bone augmentation, such as hydroxyapatite, calcium phosphate, or bioactive glass.
   • Advantages: No risk of disease transmission, customizable, and can be designed to promote bone growth.
   • Disadvantages: May not integrate as well as natural bone and can have variable resorption rates.

Surgical Techniques

1. Bone Grafting:

   • The selected graft material is placed in the deficient area of the ridge to promote new bone formation. This can be done using various techniques, including:
     • Onlay Grafting: Graft material is placed on top of the existing ridge.
     • Inlay Grafting: Graft material is placed within the ridge.

2. Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR):

   • A barrier membrane is placed over the graft material to prevent soft tissue infiltration and promote bone healing. This technique is often used in conjunction with grafting.

3. Sinus Lift:

   • In the maxilla, a sinus lift procedure may be performed to augment the bone in the posterior maxilla by elevating the sinus membrane and placing graft material.

4. Combination with Orthognathic Surgery:

   • Ridge augmentation can be performed simultaneously with orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal discrepancies and enhance the overall facial structure.

Necrotizing Sialometaplasia

Necrotizing sialometaplasia is an inflammatory lesion that primarily affects the salivary glands, particularly the minor salivary glands. It is characterized by necrosis of the glandular tissue and subsequent metaplastic changes. The exact etiology of this condition remains unknown, but several factors have been suggested to contribute to its development.

Key Features

1. Etiology:

   • The precise cause of necrotizing sialometaplasia is not fully understood. However, common suggested causes include:
     • Trauma: Physical injury to the salivary glands leading to ischemia (reduced blood flow).
     • Acinar Necrosis: Death of the acinar cells (the cells responsible for saliva production) in the salivary glands.
     • Squamous Metaplasia: Transformation of glandular epithelium into squamous epithelium, which can occur in response to injury or inflammation.

2. Demographics:

   • The condition is more commonly observed in men, particularly in their 5th to 6th decades of life (ages 50-70).

3. Common Sites:

   • Necrotizing sialometaplasia typically affects the minor salivary glands, with common locations including:
     • The palate
     • The retromolar area
     • The lip

4. Clinical Presentation:

   • The lesion usually presents as a large ulcer or an ulcerated nodule that is well-demarcated from the surrounding normal tissue.
   • The edges of the lesion often show signs of an inflammatory reaction, which may include erythema and swelling.

5. Management:

   • Conservative Treatment: The management of necrotizing sialometaplasia is generally conservative, as the lesion is self-limiting and typically heals on its own.
   • Debridement: Gentle debridement of the necrotic tissue may be performed using hydrogen peroxide or saline to promote healing.
   • Healing Time: The lesion usually heals within 6 to 8 weeks without the need for surgical intervention.

Sliding Osseous Genioplasty

Sliding osseous genioplasty is a surgical technique designed to enhance the projection of the chin, thereby improving facial aesthetics. This procedure is particularly advantageous for patients with retrogathia, where the chin is positioned further back than normal, and who typically present with Class I occlusion (normal bite relationship) without significant dentofacial deformities.

Indications for Sliding Osseous Genioplasty

1. Aesthetic Chin Surgery:

   • Most patients seeking this procedure do not have severe dentofacial deformities. They desire increased chin projection to achieve better facial balance and aesthetics.

2. Retrogathia:

   • Patients with a receding chin can significantly benefit from sliding osseous genioplasty, as it allows for the forward repositioning of the chin.

Procedure Overview

Sliding Osseous Genioplasty involves several key steps:

1. Surgical Technique:

   • Incision: The procedure can be performed through an intraoral incision (inside the mouth) or an extraoral incision (under the chin) to access the chin bone (mandibular symphysis).
   • Bone Mobilization: A horizontal osteotomy (cut) is made in the chin bone to create a movable segment. This allows the surgeon to slide the bone segment forward to increase chin projection.
   • Fixation: Once the desired position is achieved, the bone segment is secured in place using plates and screws or other fixation methods to maintain stability during the healing process.

2. Versatility:

   • Shorter and Longer Advancements: The technique can be tailored to achieve both shorter and longer advancements of the chin, depending on the patient's aesthetic goals.
   • Vertical Height Alterations: Sliding osseous genioplasty is particularly effective for making vertical height adjustments to the chin, allowing for a customized approach to facial contouring.

Recovery

• Postoperative Care:

  • Patients may experience swelling, bruising, and discomfort following the procedure. Pain relief medications are typically prescribed to manage discomfort.
  • A soft diet is often recommended during the initial recovery phase to minimize strain on the surgical site.

• Follow-Up Appointments:

  • Regular follow-up visits are necessary to monitor healing, assess the alignment of the chin, and ensure that there are no complications.
  • The surgeon will evaluate the aesthetic outcome and make any necessary adjustments to the postoperative care plan.

 Gate Control Theory (Melzack & Wall, 1965)

• Suggests pain modulation occurs in the spinal dorsal horn before reaching the brain.
• Small fibers (A-delta & C) transmit nociceptive (pain) signals.
• Large fibers (A-beta) inhibit pain by activating inhibitory interneurons.
• The “gate” can be closed by:
  • Non-painful stimuli (e.g. touch, vibration)
  • Descending pathways from brain
  • Pharmacologic methods (opioids, local anesthetics)

Clinical Applications

• Explains effect of rubbing injured site
• Basis of TENS therapy and physiotherapy techniques
• Encourages multimodal analgesia
• Supports cognitive-behavioral strategies (distraction, relaxation)

• Gow – Gates landmarks:
  • Corner of mouth
  • Disto – palatal cusp of maxillary 2nd molar
  • Neck of condyle
  • Extraoral: Lower border of tragus
• Laryngeal mask airway (LMA): Supraglottic device
• Tracheostomy incision: 4–5 cm below cricoid cartilage
• Common tracheostomy complications:
  • Peri – op: Anterior jugular vein injury
  • Late: Innominate artery fistula