Talk to us?

- NEETMDS- courses
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Osteomyelitis of the Jaw (OML)

Osteomyelitis of the jaw (OML) is a serious infection of the bone that can lead to significant morbidity if not properly diagnosed and treated. Understanding the etiology and microbiological profile of OML is crucial for effective management. Here’s a detailed overview based on the information provided.

Historical Perspective on Etiology

  • Traditional View: In the past, the etiology of OML was primarily associated with skin surface bacteria, particularly Staphylococcus aureus. Other bacteria, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis and hemolytic streptococci, were also implicated.
  • Reevaluation: Recent findings indicate that S. aureus is not the primary pathogen in cases of OML affecting tooth-bearing bone. This shift in understanding highlights the complexity of the microbial landscape in jaw infections.

Microbiological Profile

  1. Common Pathogens:

    • Aerobic Streptococci:
      • α-Hemolytic Streptococci: Particularly Streptococcus viridans, which are part of the normal oral flora and can become pathogenic under certain conditions.
    • Anaerobic Streptococci: These bacteria thrive in low-oxygen environments and are significant contributors to OML.
    • Other Anaerobes:
      • Peptostreptococcus: A genus of anaerobic bacteria commonly found in the oral cavity.
      • Fusobacterium: Another group of anaerobic bacteria that can be involved in polymicrobial infections.
      • Bacteroides: These bacteria are also part of the normal flora but can cause infections when the balance is disrupted.
  2. Additional Organisms:

    • Gram-Negative Organisms:
      • KlebsiellaPseudomonas, and Proteus species may also be isolated in some cases, particularly in chronic or complicated infections.
    • Specific Pathogens:
      • Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Can cause osteomyelitis in the jaw, particularly in immunocompromised individuals.
      • Treponema pallidum: The causative agent of syphilis, which can lead to specific forms of osteomyelitis.
      • Actinomyces species: Known for causing actinomycosis, these bacteria can also be involved in jaw infections.

Polymicrobial Nature of OML

  • Polymicrobial Disease: Established acute OML is typically a polymicrobial infection, meaning it involves multiple types of bacteria. The common bacterial constituents include:
    • Streptococci (both aerobic and anaerobic)
    • Bacteroides
    • Peptostreptococci
    • Fusobacteria
    • Other opportunistic bacteria that may contribute to the infection.

Clinical Implications

  • Sinus Tract Cultures: Cultures obtained from sinus tracts in the jaw may often be misleading. They can be contaminated with skin flora, such as Staphylococcus species, which do not accurately represent the pathogens responsible for the underlying osteomyelitis.
  • Diagnosis and Treatment: Understanding the polymicrobial nature of OML is essential for effective diagnosis and treatment. Empirical antibiotic therapy should consider the range of potential pathogens, and cultures should be interpreted with caution.

Clinical Signs and Their Significance

Understanding various clinical signs is crucial for diagnosing specific conditions and injuries. Below are descriptions of several important signs, including Battle sign, Chvostek’s sign, Guerin’s sign, and Tinel’s sign, along with their clinical implications.

1. Battle Sign

  • Description: Battle sign refers to ecchymosis (bruising) in the mastoid region, typically behind the ear.
  • Clinical Significance: This sign is indicative of a posterior basilar skull fracture. The bruising occurs due to the extravasation of blood from the fracture site, which can be a sign of significant head trauma. It is important to evaluate for other associated injuries, such as intracranial hemorrhage.

2. Chvostek’s Sign

  • Description: Chvostek’s sign is characterized by the twitching of the facial muscles in response to tapping over the area of the facial nerve (typically in front of the ear).
  • Clinical Significance: This sign is often observed in patients who are hypocalcemic (have low calcium levels). The twitching indicates increased neuromuscular excitability due to low calcium levels, which can lead to tetany and other complications. It is commonly assessed in conditions such as hypoparathyroidism.

3. Guerin’s Sign

  • Description: Guerin’s sign is the presence of ecchymosis along the posterior soft palate bilaterally.
  • Clinical Significance: This sign is indicative of pterygoid plate disjunction or fracture. It suggests significant trauma to the maxillofacial region, often associated with fractures of the skull base or facial skeleton. The presence of bruising in this area can help in diagnosing the extent of facial injuries.

4. Tinel’s Sign

  • Description: Tinel’s sign is a provocative test where light percussion over a nerve elicits a distal tingling sensation.
  • Clinical Significance: This sign is often interpreted as a sign of small fiber recovery in regenerating nerve sprouts. It is commonly used in the assessment of nerve injuries, such as carpal tunnel syndrome or after nerve repair surgeries. A positive Tinel’s sign indicates that the nerve is healing and that sensory function may be returning.

Maxillectomy

Maxillectomy is a surgical procedure involving the resection of the maxilla (upper jaw) and is typically performed to remove tumors, treat severe infections, or address other pathological conditions affecting the maxillary region. The procedure requires careful planning and execution to ensure adequate access, removal of the affected tissue, and preservation of surrounding structures for optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Surgical Access and Incision

  1. Weber-Fergusson Incision:

    • The classic approach to access the maxilla is through the Weber-Fergusson incision. This incision provides good visibility and access to the maxillary region.
    • Temporary Tarsorrhaphy: The eyelids are temporarily closed using tarsorrhaphy sutures to protect the eye during the procedure.
  2. Tattooing for Aesthetic Alignment:

    • To achieve better cosmetic results, it is recommended to tattoo the vermilion border and other key points on both sides of the incision with methylene blue. These points serve as guides for alignment during closure.
  3. Incision Design:

    • The incision typically splits the midline of the upper lip but can be modified for better cosmetic outcomes by incising along the philtral ridges and offsetting the incision at the vermilion border.
    • The incision is turned 2 mm from the medial canthus of the eye. Intraorally, the incision continues through the gingival margin and connects with a horizontal incision at the depth of the labiobuccal vestibule, extending back to the maxillary tuberosity.
  4. Continuation of the Incision:

    • From the maxillary tuberosity, the incision turns medially across the posterior edge of the hard palate and then turns 90 degrees anteriorly, several millimeters to the proximal side of the midline, crossing the gingival margin again if possible.
  5. Incision to Bone:

    • The incision is carried down to the bone, except beneath the lower eyelid, where the orbicularis oculi muscle is preserved. The cheek flap is then reflected back to the tuberosity.

Surgical Procedure

  1. Extraction and Elevation:

    • The central incisor on the involved side is extracted, and the gingival and palatal mucosa are elevated back to the midline.
  2. Deepening the Incision:

    • The incision extending around the nose is deepened into the nasal cavity. The palatal bone is divided near the midline using a saw blade or bur.
  3. Separation of Bone:

    • The basal bone is separated from the frontal process of the maxilla using an osteotome. The orbicularis oculi muscle is retracted superiorly, and the bone cut is extended across the maxilla, just below the infraorbital rim, into the zygoma.
  4. Maxillary Sinus:

    • If the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus has not been invaded by the tumor, it is separated from the pterygoid plates using a pterygoid chisel.
  5. Specimen Removal:

    • The entire specimen is removed by severing the remaining attachments with large curved scissors placed behind the maxilla.

Postoperative Considerations

  • Wound Care: Proper care of the surgical site is essential to prevent infection and promote healing.
  • Rehabilitation: Patients may require rehabilitation to address functional issues related to speech, swallowing, and facial aesthetics.
  • Follow-Up: Regular follow-up appointments are necessary to monitor healing and assess for any complications or recurrence of disease.

Hockey Stick or London Hospital Elevator

The Hockey Stick Elevator, also known as the London Hospital Elevator, is a dental instrument used primarily in oral surgery and tooth extraction procedures. It is designed to facilitate the removal of tooth roots and other dental structures.

Design and Features

  • Blade Shape: The Hockey Stick Elevator features a straight blade that is angled relative to the shank, similar to the Cryer’s elevator. However, unlike the Cryer’s elevator, which has a triangular blade, the Hockey Stick Elevator has a straight blade with a convex surface on one side and a flat surface on the other.

  • Working Surface:

    • The flat surface of the blade is the working surface and is equipped with transverse serrations. These serrations enhance the instrument's grip and contact with the root stump, allowing for more effective leverage during extraction.
  • Appearance: The instrument resembles a hockey stick, which is how it derives its name. The distinctive shape aids in its identification and use in clinical settings.

Principles of Operation

  • Lever and Wedge Principle:
    • The Hockey Stick Elevator operates on the same principles as the Cryer’s elevator, utilizing the lever and wedge principle. This means that the instrument can be used to apply force to the tooth or root, effectively loosening it from the surrounding bone and periodontal ligament.
  • Functionality:
    • The primary function of the Hockey Stick Elevator is to elevate and luxate teeth or root fragments during extraction procedures. It can be particularly useful in cases where the tooth is impacted or has a curved root.

Submasseteric Space Infection

Submasseteric space infection refers to an infection that occurs in the submasseteric space, which is located beneath the masseter muscle. This space is clinically significant in the context of dental infections, particularly those arising from the lower third molars (wisdom teeth) or other odontogenic sources. Understanding the anatomy and potential spread of infections in this area is crucial for effective diagnosis and management.

Anatomy of the Submasseteric Space

  1. Location:

    • The submasseteric space is situated beneath the masseter muscle, which is a major muscle involved in mastication (chewing).
    • This space is bordered superiorly by the masseter muscle and inferiorly by the lower border of the ramus of the mandible.
  2. Boundaries:

    • Inferior Boundary: The extension of an abscess or infection inferiorly is limited by the firm attachment of the masseter muscle to the lower border of the ramus of the mandible. This attachment creates a barrier that can restrict the spread of infection downward.
    • Anterior Boundary: The forward spread of infection beyond the anterior border of the ramus is restricted by the anterior tail of the tendon of the temporalis muscle, which inserts into the anterior border of the ramus. This anatomical feature helps to contain infections within the submasseteric space.
  3. Posterior Boundary: The posterior limit of the submasseteric space is generally defined by the posterior border of the ramus of the mandible.

Clinical Implications

  1. Sources of Infection:

    • Infections in the submasseteric space often arise from odontogenic sources, such as:
      • Pericoronitis associated with impacted lower third molars.
      • Dental abscesses from other teeth in the mandible.
      • Periodontal infections.
  2. Symptoms:

    • Patients with submasseteric space infections may present with:
      • Swelling and tenderness in the area of the masseter muscle.
      • Limited mouth opening (trismus) due to muscle spasm or swelling.
      • Pain that may radiate to the ear or temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
      • Fever and systemic signs of infection in more severe cases.
  3. Diagnosis:

    • Diagnosis is typically made through clinical examination and imaging studies, such as panoramic radiographs or CT scans, to assess the extent of the infection and its relationship to surrounding structures.
  4. Management:

    • Treatment of submasseteric space infections usually involves:
      • Antibiotic Therapy: Broad-spectrum antibiotics are often initiated to control the infection.
      • Surgical Intervention: Drainage of the abscess may be necessary, especially if there is significant swelling or if the patient is not responding to conservative management. Incision and drainage can be performed intraorally or extraorally, depending on the extent of the infection.
      • Management of the Source: Addressing the underlying dental issue, such as extraction of an impacted tooth or treatment of a dental abscess, is essential to prevent recurrence.

Management of Greenstick/Crack Fractures of the Mandible

Greenstick fractures (or crack fractures) are incomplete fractures that typically occur in children due to the flexibility of their bones. Fracture in mandible,  can often be managed conservatively, especially when there is no malocclusion (misalignment of the teeth).

Conservative Management

  • No Fixation Required:
    • For greenstick fractures without malocclusion, surgical fixation is generally not necessary.
    • Closed Reduction: The fracture can be managed through closed reduction, which involves realigning the fractured bone without surgical exposure.
  • Dietary Recommendations:
    • Patients are advised to consume soft foods and maintain adequate hydration with lots of fluids to facilitate healing and minimize discomfort during eating.

Surgical Management Options

In cases where surgical intervention is required, or for more complex fractures, the following methods can be employed:

  1. Kirschner Wire (K-wire) Fixation:

    • Indications: K-wires can be used for both dentulous (having teeth) and edentulous (without teeth) mandibles.
    • Technique: K-wires are inserted through the bone fragments to stabilize the fracture. This method provides internal fixation and helps maintain alignment during the healing process.
  2. Circumferential Wiring:

    • Indications: This technique is also applicable for both dentulous and edentulous mandibles.
    • Technique: Circumferential wiring involves wrapping wire around the mandible to stabilize the fracture. This method can provide additional support and is often used in conjunction with other fixation techniques.
  3. External Pin Fixation:

    • Indications: Primarily used for edentulous mandibles.
    • Technique: External pin fixation involves placing pins into the bone that are connected to an external frame. This method allows for stabilization of the mandible while avoiding intraoral fixation, which can be beneficial in certain clinical scenarios.

Classes of Hemorrhagic Shock (ATLS Classification)

Hemorrhagic shock is a critical condition resulting from significant blood loss, leading to inadequate tissue perfusion and oxygenation. The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course classifies hemorrhagic shock into four classes based on various physiological parameters. Understanding these classes helps guide the management and treatment of patients experiencing hemorrhagic shock.

Class Descriptions

  1. Class I Hemorrhagic Shock:

    • Blood Loss: 0-15% (up to 750 mL)
    • CNS Status: Slightly anxious; the patient may be alert and oriented.
    • Pulse: Heart rate <100 beats/min.
    • Blood Pressure: Normal.
    • Pulse Pressure: Normal.
    • Respiratory Rate: 14-20 breaths/min.
    • Urine Output: >30 mL/hr, indicating adequate renal perfusion.
    • Fluid Resuscitation: Crystalloid fluids are typically sufficient.
  2. Class II Hemorrhagic Shock:

    • Blood Loss: 15-30% (750-1500 mL)
    • CNS Status: Mildly anxious; the patient may show signs of distress.
    • Pulse: Heart rate >100 beats/min.
    • Blood Pressure: Still normal, but compensatory mechanisms are activated.
    • Pulse Pressure: Decreased due to increased heart rate and peripheral vasoconstriction.
    • Respiratory Rate: 20-30 breaths/min.
    • Urine Output: 20-30 mL/hr, indicating reduced renal perfusion.
    • Fluid Resuscitation: Crystalloid fluids are still appropriate.
  3. Class III Hemorrhagic Shock:

    • Blood Loss: 30-40% (1500-2000 mL)
    • CNS Status: Anxious or confused; the patient may have altered mental status.
    • Pulse: Heart rate >120 beats/min.
    • Blood Pressure: Decreased; signs of hypotension may be present.
    • Pulse Pressure: Decreased.
    • Respiratory Rate: 30-40 breaths/min.
    • Urine Output: 5-15 mL/hr, indicating significant renal impairment.
    • Fluid Resuscitation: Crystalloid fluids plus blood products may be necessary.
  4. Class IV Hemorrhagic Shock:

    • Blood Loss: >40% (>2000 mL)
    • CNS Status: Confused or lethargic; the patient may be unresponsive.
    • Pulse: Heart rate >140 beats/min.
    • Blood Pressure: Decreased; severe hypotension is likely.
    • Pulse Pressure: Decreased.
    • Respiratory Rate: >35 breaths/min.
    • Urine Output: Negligible, indicating severe renal failure.
    • Fluid Resuscitation: Immediate crystalloid and blood products are critical.

Explore by Exams