Radiological Signs Indicating Relationship Between Mandibular Third Molars and the Inferior Alveolar Canal

In 1960, Howe and Payton identified seven radiological signs that suggest a close relationship between the mandibular third molar (wisdom tooth) and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC). Recognizing these signs is crucial for dental practitioners, especially when planning for the extraction of impacted third molars, as they can indicate potential complications such as nerve injury. Below are the seven signs explained in detail:

1. Darkening of the Root

• This sign appears as a radiolucent area at the root of the mandibular third molar, indicating that the root is in close proximity to the IAC.
• Clinical Significance: Darkening suggests that the root may be in contact with or resorbing against the canal, which can increase the risk of nerve damage during extraction.

2. Deflected Root

• This sign is characterized by a deviation or angulation of the root of the mandibular third molar.
• Clinical Significance: A deflected root may indicate that the tooth is pushing against the IAC, suggesting a close anatomical relationship that could complicate surgical extraction.

3. Narrowing of the Root

• This sign is observed as a reduction in the width of the root, often seen on radiographs.
• Clinical Significance: Narrowing may indicate that the root is being resorbed or is in close contact with the IAC, which can pose a risk during extraction.

4. Interruption of the White Line(s)

• The white line refers to the radiopaque outline of the IAC. An interruption in this line can be seen on radiographs.
• Clinical Significance: This interruption suggests that the canal may be displaced or affected by the root of the third molar, indicating a potential risk for nerve injury.

5. Diversion of the Inferior Alveolar Canal

• This sign is characterized by a noticeable change in the path of the IAC, which may appear to be deflected or diverted around the root of the third molar.
• Clinical Significance: Diversion of the canal indicates that the root is in close proximity to the IAC, which can complicate surgical procedures and increase the risk of nerve damage.

6. Narrowing of the Inferior Alveolar Canal (IAC)

•  This sign appears as a reduction in the width of the IAC on radiographs.
• Clinical Significance: Narrowing of the canal may suggest that the root of the third molar is encroaching upon the canal, indicating a close relationship that could lead to complications during extraction.

7. Hourglass Form

• This sign indicates a partial or complete encirclement of the IAC by the root of the mandibular third molar, resembling an hourglass shape on radiographs.
• Clinical Significance: An hourglass form suggests that the root may be significantly impinging on the IAC, which poses a high risk for nerve injury during extraction.

Surgical Considerations for the Submandibular and Parotid Glands

When performing surgery on the submandibular and parotid glands, it is crucial to be aware of the anatomical structures and nerves at risk to minimize complications. Below is an overview of the key nerves and anatomical landmarks relevant to these surgical procedures.

Major Nerves at Risk During Submandibular Gland Surgery

1. Hypoglossal Nerve (CN XII):

   • This nerve is responsible for motor innervation to the muscles of the tongue. It lies deep to the submandibular gland and is at risk during surgical manipulation in this area.

2. Marginal Mandibular Nerve:

   • A branch of the facial nerve (CN VII), the marginal mandibular nerve innervates the muscles of the lower lip and chin. It runs just deep to the superficial layer of the deep cervical fascia, below the platysma muscle, making it vulnerable during submandibular gland surgery.

3. Lingual Nerve:

   • The lingual nerve provides sensory innervation to the anterior two-thirds of the tongue and carries parasympathetic fibers to the submandibular gland via the submandibular ganglion. It is located in close proximity to the submandibular gland and is at risk during dissection.

Anatomical Considerations for Parotid Gland Surgery

• Parotid Fascia:

  • The parotid gland is encased in a capsule of parotid fascia, which provides a protective layer during surgical procedures.

• Facial Nerve (CN VII):

  • The facial nerve is a critical structure to identify during parotid gland surgery to prevent injury. Key landmarks for locating the facial nerve include:
    • Tympanomastoid Suture Line: This is a reliable landmark for identifying the main trunk of the facial nerve, which lies just deep and medial to this suture.
    • Tragal Pointer: The nerve is located about 1 cm deep and inferior to the tragal pointer, although this landmark is less reliable.
    • Posterior Belly of the Digastric Muscle: This muscle provides a reference for the approximate depth of the facial nerve.
    • Peripheral Buccal Branches: While following these branches can help identify the nerve, this should not be the standard approach due to the risk of injury.

Submandibular Gland Anatomy

• Location:

  • The submandibular gland is situated in the submandibular triangle of the neck, which is bordered by the mandible and the digastric muscles.

• Mylohyoid Muscle:

  • The gland wraps around the mylohyoid muscle, which is typically retracted anteriorly during surgery to provide better exposure of the gland.

• CN XII:

  • The hypoglossal nerve lies deep to the submandibular gland, making it important to identify and protect during surgical procedures.

Osseointegration Testing

Torque Testing (Primary Assessment)

• Force required: 10 – 20 N/cm without unscrewing
• Lateral force test: 5 lb should show no movement
• Failed implant indicators:
  • Horizontal mobility >1mm
  • Movement with <500gm force

Clinical Signs of Successful Integration

• Percussion test (no mobility)
• Immobility when placing fixture mount
• Immobility with impression coping placement

Implant Failure

• Most useful radiographic sign: Loss of crestal bone
• Imaging compatibility: MRI and CT scans NOT contraindicated with pure titanium implants
• CT advantage: Can subtract titanium from images, eliminating scatter

• Cribriform plate: Roof of olfactory region
• Nasolacrimal duct: Opens into inferior meatus; post – DCR → middle meatus
• Ethmoidal nerves:
  • Anterior: Nasal septum, mucosa, skin
  • Posterior: Ethmoidal & sphenoidal sinuses
• Infraorbital fissure: ~20 mm from orbital rim
• Superior orbital fissure: ~35 mm from frontozygomatic suture
• Optic canal: ≥42 mm from anterior lacrimal crest

Champy Technique of Fracture Stabilization

The Champy technique, developed by Champy et al. in the mid-1970s, is a method of fracture stabilization that utilizes non-compression monocortical miniplates applied as tension bands. This technique is particularly relevant in the context of mandibular fractures and is based on biomechanical principles that optimize the stability and healing of the bone.

Key Principles of the Champy Technique

1. Biomechanical Considerations:

   • Tensile and Compressive Stresses: Biomechanical studies have shown that tensile stresses occur in the upper border of the mandible, while compressive stresses are found in the lower border. This understanding is crucial for the placement of plates.
   • Bending and Torsional Forces: The forces acting on the mandible primarily produce bending movements. In the symphysis and parasymphysis regions, torsional forces are more significant than bending moments.

2. Ideal Osteosynthesis Line:

   • Champy et al. established the "ideal osteosynthesis line" at the base of the alveolar process. This line is critical for the effective placement of plates to ensure stability during the healing process.
   • Plate Placement:
     • Anterior Region: In the area between the mental foramina, a subapical plate is placed, and an additional plate is positioned near the lower border of the mandible to counteract torsional forces.
     • Posterior Region: Behind the mental foramen, the plate is applied just below the dental roots and above the inferior alveolar nerve.
     • Angle of Mandible: The plate is placed on the broad surface of the external oblique ridge.

3. Tension Band Principle:

   • The use of miniplates as tension bands allows for the distribution of forces across the fracture site, enhancing stability and promoting healing.

Treatment Steps

1. Reduction:

   • The first step in fracture treatment is the accurate reduction of the fracture fragments to restore normal anatomy.

2. Stabilization:

   • Following reduction, stabilization is achieved using the Champy technique, which involves the application of miniplates in accordance with the biomechanical principles outlined above.

3. Maxillomandibular Fixation (MMF):

   • MMF is often used as a standard method for both reduction and stabilization, particularly in cases where additional support is needed.

4. External Fixation:

   • In cases of atrophic edentulous mandibular fractures, extensive soft tissue injuries, severe communication, or infected fractures, external fixation may be considered.

Classification of Internal Fixation Techniques

• Absolute Stability:

  • Rigid internal fixation methods, such as compression plates, lag screws, and the tension band principle, fall under this category. These techniques provide strong stabilization but may compromise blood supply to the bone.

• Relative Stability:

  • Techniques such as bridging, biologic (flexible) fixation, and the Champy technique are classified as relative stability methods. These techniques allow for some movement at the fracture site, which can promote healing by maintaining blood supply to the cortical bone.

Biologic Fixation

• New Paradigm:
  • Biologic fixation represents a shift in fracture treatment philosophy, emphasizing that absolute stability is not always beneficial. Allowing for some movement at the fracture site can enhance blood supply and promote healing.
• Improved Blood Supply:
  • Not pressing the plate against the bone helps maintain blood supply to the cortical bone and prevents the formation of early temporary porosity, which can be detrimental to healing.

Sedan Classification (3 Grades)

Classic classification based on functional and anatomical severity:

Grade I: Neurapraxia

• Definition: Temporary loss of nerve function without structural damage
• Pathophysiology: Local demyelination, nerve conduction block
• Recovery: Complete, spontaneous recovery in weeks to months
• Prognosis: Excellent (100% recovery expected)
• Example: Temporary numbness after local anesthesia

Grade II: Axonotmesis

• Definition: Axonal damage with intact nerve sheath (endoneurium preserved)
• Pathophysiology: Axonal disruption, Wallerian degeneration distal to injury
• Recovery: Spontaneous regeneration possible, slower process
• Rate: ~1mm/day axonal regrowth
• Prognosis: Good to fair, may have incomplete recovery
• Timeline: Months to 1-2 years

Grade III: Neurotmesis

• Definition: Complete nerve transection with disruption of all structures
• Pathophysiology: Complete anatomical and functional discontinuity
• Recovery: No spontaneous recovery without surgical intervention
• Prognosis: Poor without repair, depends on surgical reconstruction
• Treatment: Requires surgical repair or grafting