Characteristics of Middle-Third Facial Fractures

Middle-third facial fractures, often referred to as "midfacial fractures," involve the central portion of the face, including the nasal bones, maxilla, and zygomatic arch. These fractures can result from various types of trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents, falls, or physical assaults. The following points highlight the key features and clinical implications of middle-third facial fractures:

1. Oedema of the Middle Third of the Face

• Rapid Development: Oedema (swelling) in the middle third of the face develops quickly after the injury, leading to a characteristic "balloon" appearance. This swelling is due to the accumulation of fluid in the soft tissues of the face.

• Absence of Deep Cervical Fascia: The unique anatomical structure of the middle third of the face contributes to this swelling. The absence of deep cervical fascia in this region allows for the rapid spread of fluid, resulting in pronounced oedema.

• Clinical Presentation: In the early stages following injury, patients with middle-third fractures often present with similar facial appearances due to the characteristic swelling. This can make diagnosis based solely on visual inspection challenging.

2. Lengthening of the Face

• Displacement of the Middle Third: The downward and backward displacement of the middle third of the facial skeleton can lead to an increase in the overall length of the face. This displacement forces the mandible to open, which can result in a change in occlusion, particularly in the molar region.

• Gagging of Occlusion: The altered position of the mandible can lead to a malocclusion, where the upper and lower teeth do not align properly. This can cause discomfort and difficulty in chewing or speaking.

• Delayed Recognition of Lengthening: The true increase in facial length may not be fully appreciated until the initial oedema subsides. As the swelling decreases, the changes in facial structure become more apparent.

3. Nasal Obstruction

• Blood Clots in the Nares: Following a middle-third fracture, the nares (nostrils) may become obstructed by blood clots, leading to nasal congestion. This can significantly impact the patient's ability to breathe through the nose.

• Mouth Breathing: Due to the obstruction, patients are often forced to breathe through their mouths, which can lead to additional complications, such as dry mouth and increased risk of respiratory infections.

Rigid Fixation

Rigid fixation is a surgical technique used to stabilize fractured bones.

Types of Rigid Fixation

Rigid fixation can be achieved using various types of plates and devices, including:

1. Simple Non-Compression Bone Plates:

   • These plates provide stability without applying compressive forces across the fracture site.

2. Mini Bone Plates:

   • Smaller plates designed for use in areas where space is limited, providing adequate stabilization for smaller fractures.

3. Compression Plates:

   • These plates apply compressive forces across the fracture site, promoting bone healing by encouraging contact between the fracture fragments.

4. Reconstruction Plates:

   • Used for complex fractures or reconstructions, these plates can be contoured to fit the specific anatomy of the fractured bone.

Transosseous Wiring (Intraosseous Wiring)

Transosseous wiring is a traditional and effective method for the fixation of jaw bone fractures. It involves the following steps:

1. Technique:

   • Holes are drilled in the bony fragments on either side of the fracture line.
   • A length of 26-gauge stainless steel wire is passed through the holes and across the fracture.

2. Reduction:

   • The fracture must be reduced independently, ensuring that the teeth are in occlusion before securing the wire.

3. Twisting the Wire:

   • After achieving proper alignment, the free ends of the wire are twisted to secure the fracture.
   • The twisted ends are cut short and tucked into the nearest drill hole to prevent irritation to surrounding tissues.

4. Variations:

   • The single strand wire fixation in a horizontal manner is the simplest form of intraosseous wiring, but it can be modified in various ways depending on the specific needs of the fracture and the patient.

Other fixation techniques

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF):
Surgical exposure of the fracture site, followed by reduction and fixation with plates, screws, or nails

Closed reduction and immobilization (CRII):
Manipulation of the bone fragments into alignment without surgical exposure, followed by cast or splint immobilization

Intramedullary nailing:
Insertion of a metal rod (nail) into the medullary canal of the bone to stabilize long bone fractures

External fixation:
A device with pins inserted through the bone fragments and connected to an external frame to provide stability
 
Tension band wiring:
A technique using wires to apply tension across a fracture site, particularly useful for avulsion fractures

--------------------------------

• Minimum platelet count for surgery: 75,000/cu mm
• Absolute contraindication: Platelets < 50,000/cu mm
• Blood unit volume: 450 mL
• PRBC effect: ↑ Hb by 1 g/dL, ↑ Hct by 3%
• Warfarin patient: Check INR & PT before extraction
• Normal PT: 11–14 seconds

• Hydrocortisone injection: Mixed with 2% lignocaine for joint inflammation
• GA contraindications: Hemoglobinopathies, severe hematologic disorders
• Non – depolarizing relaxants: Reversed by neostigmine + atropine
• Succinylcholine: Depolarizing muscle relaxant
• Inferior turbinectomy: Done when maxilla is >6 mm superiorly positioned

 Gate Control Theory (Melzack & Wall, 1965)

• Suggests pain modulation occurs in the spinal dorsal horn before reaching the brain.
• Small fibers (A-delta & C) transmit nociceptive (pain) signals.
• Large fibers (A-beta) inhibit pain by activating inhibitory interneurons.
• The “gate” can be closed by:
  • Non-painful stimuli (e.g. touch, vibration)
  • Descending pathways from brain
  • Pharmacologic methods (opioids, local anesthetics)

Clinical Applications

• Explains effect of rubbing injured site
• Basis of TENS therapy and physiotherapy techniques
• Encourages multimodal analgesia
• Supports cognitive-behavioral strategies (distraction, relaxation)

Classification and Management of Impacted Third Molars

Impacted third molars, commonly known as wisdom teeth, can present in various orientations and depths, influencing the difficulty of their extraction. Understanding the types of impactions and their classifications is crucial for planning surgical intervention.

Types of Impaction

1. Mesioangular Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is tilted toward the second molar in a mesial direction.
   • Prevalence: Comprises approximately 43% of all impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Generally acknowledged as the least difficult type of impaction to remove.

2. Vertical Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is positioned vertically, with the crown facing upward.
   • Prevalence: Accounts for about 38% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty in removal.

3. Distoangular Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is tilted away from the second molar in a distal direction.
   • Prevalence: Comprises approximately 6% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: Considered the most difficult type of impaction to remove due to the withdrawal pathway running into the mandibular ramus.

4. Horizontal Impaction:

   • Description: The tooth is positioned horizontally, with the crown facing the buccal or lingual side.
   • Prevalence: Accounts for about 3% of impacted teeth.
   • Difficulty: More difficult than mesioangular but less difficult than distoangular.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Types of Impaction

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Distoangular > Horizontal > Vertical > Mesioangular

Pell and Gregory Classification

The Pell and Gregory classification system categorizes impacted teeth based on their relationship to the mandibular ramus and the occlusal plane. This classification helps assess the difficulty of extraction.

Classification Based on Coverage by the Mandibular Ramus

1. Class 1:

   • Description: Mesiodistal diameter of the crown is completely anterior to the anterior border of the mandibular ramus.
   • Difficulty: Easiest to remove.

2. Class 2:

   • Description: Approximately one-half of the tooth is covered by the ramus.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty.

3. Class 3:

   • Description: The tooth is completely within the mandibular ramus.
   • Difficulty: Most difficult to remove.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Ramus Coverage

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Class 3 > Class 2 > Class 1

Pell and Gregory Classification Based on Relationship to Occlusal Plane

This classification assesses the depth of the impacted tooth relative to the occlusal plane of the second molar.

1. Class A:

   • Description: The occlusal surface of the impacted tooth is level or nearly level with the occlusal plane of the second molar.
   • Difficulty: Easiest to remove.

2. Class B:

   • Description: The occlusal surface lies between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the second molar.
   • Difficulty: Moderate difficulty.

3. Class C:

   • Description: The occlusal surface is below the cervical line of the second molars.
   • Difficulty: Most difficult to remove.

Decreasing Level of Difficulty for Occlusal Plane Relationship

• Order of Difficulty:
  • Class C > Class B > Class A

Summary of Extraction Difficulty

• Most Difficult Impaction:
  • Distoangular impaction with Class 3 ramus coverage and Class C depth.
• Easiest Impaction:
  • Mesioangular impaction with Class 1 ramus coverage and Class A dep