Capacity of Motion of the Mandible

The capacity of motion of the mandible is a crucial aspect of dental and orthodontic practice, as it influences occlusion, function, and treatment planning. In 1952, Dr. Harold Posselt developed a systematic approach to recording and analyzing mandibular movements, resulting in what is now known as Posselt's diagram. This guide will provide an overview of Posselt's work, the significance of mandibular motion, and the key points of reference used in clinical practice.

1. Posselt's Diagram

A. Historical Context

• Development: In 1952, Dr. Harold Posselt utilized a system of clutches and flags to record the motion of the mandible. His work laid the foundation for understanding mandibular dynamics and occlusion.
• Recording Method: The original recordings were conducted outside of the mouth, which magnified the vertical dimension of movement but did not accurately represent the horizontal dimension.

B. Modern Techniques

• Digital Recording: Advances in technology have allowed for the use of digital computer techniques to record mandibular motion in real-time. This enables accurate measurement of movements in both vertical and horizontal dimensions.
• Reconstruction of Motion: Modern systems can compute and visualize mandibular motion at multiple points simultaneously, providing valuable insights for clinical applications.

2. Key Points of Reference

Three significant points of reference are particularly important in the study of mandibular motion:

A. Incisor Point

• Location: The incisor point is located on the midline of the mandible at the junction of the facial surface of the mandibular central incisors and the incisal edge.
• Clinical Significance: This point is crucial for assessing anterior guidance and incisal function during mandibular movements.

B. Molar Point

• Location: The molar point is defined as the tip of the mesiofacial cusp of the mandibular first molar on a specified side.
• Clinical Significance: The molar point is important for evaluating occlusal relationships and the functional dynamics of the posterior teeth during movement.

C. Condyle Point

• Location: The condyle point refers to the center of rotation of the mandibular condyle on the specified side.
• Clinical Significance: Understanding the condyle point is essential for analyzing the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function and the overall biomechanics of the mandible.

3. Clinical Implications

A. Occlusion and Function

• Mandibular Motion: The capacity of motion of the mandible affects occlusal relationships, functional movements, and the overall health of the masticatory system.
• Treatment Planning: Knowledge of mandibular motion is critical for orthodontic treatment, prosthodontics, and restorative dentistry, as it influences the design and placement of restorations and appliances.

B. Diagnosis and Assessment

• Evaluation of Movement: Clinicians can use the principles established by Posselt to assess and diagnose issues related to mandibular function, such as limitations in movement or discrepancies in occlusion.

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs)

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements (RMGIs) represent a significant advancement in dental materials, combining the beneficial properties of both glass ionomer cements and composite resins. This overview will discuss the composition, advantages, and disadvantages of RMGIs, highlighting their role in modern dentistry.

1. Composition of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

A. Introduction

• First Introduced: RMGIs were first introduced as Vitrebond (3M), utilizing a powder-liquid system designed to enhance the properties of traditional glass ionomer cements.

B. Components

• Powder: The powder component consists of fluorosilicate glass, which provides the material with its glass ionomer properties. It also contains a photoinitiator or chemical initiator to facilitate setting.
• Liquid: The liquid component contains:
  • 15 to 25% Resin Component: Typically in the form of Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate (HEMA), which enhances the material's bonding and aesthetic properties.
  • Polyacrylic Acid Copolymer: This component contributes to the chemical adhesion properties of the cement.
  • Photoinitiator and Water: These components are essential for the setting reaction and workability of the material.

2. Advantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

RMGIs offer a range of benefits that make them suitable for various dental applications:

1. Extended Working Time: RMGIs provide a longer working time compared to traditional glass ionomers, allowing for more flexibility during placement.

2. Control on Setting: The setting reaction can be controlled through light curing, which allows for adjustments before the material hardens.

3. Good Adaptation: RMGIs exhibit excellent adaptation to tooth structure, which helps minimize gaps and improve the seal.

4. Chemical Adhesion to Enamel and Dentin: RMGIs bond chemically to both enamel and dentin, enhancing retention and reducing the risk of microleakage.

5. Fluoride Release: Like traditional glass ionomers, RMGIs release fluoride, which can help in the prevention of secondary caries.

6. Improved Aesthetics: The resin component allows for better color matching and aesthetics compared to conventional glass ionomers.

7. Low Interfacial Shrinkage Stress: RMGIs exhibit lower shrinkage stress upon setting compared to composite resins, reducing the risk of debonding or gap formation.

8. Superior Strength Characteristics: RMGIs generally have improved mechanical properties, making them suitable for a wider range of clinical applications.

3. Disadvantages of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cements

Despite their advantages, RMGIs also have some limitations:

1. Shrinkage on Setting: RMGIs can experience some degree of shrinkage during the setting process, which may affect the marginal integrity of the restoration.

2. Limited Depth of Cure: The depth of cure can be limited, especially when using more opaque lining cements. This can affect the effectiveness of the material in deeper cavities.

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) Classification

Early Childhood Caries (ECC) is a significant public health concern characterized by the presence of carious lesions in young children. It is classified into three types based on severity, affected teeth, and underlying causes. Understanding these classifications helps in diagnosing, preventing, and managing ECC effectively.

Type I ECC (Mild to Moderate)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Carious lesions primarily involve the molars and incisors.
• Age Group: Typically observed in children aged 2 to 5 years.

B. Causes

• Dietary Factors: The primary cause is usually a combination of cariogenic semisolid or solid foods, such as sugary snacks and beverages.
• Oral Hygiene: Lack of proper oral hygiene practices contributes significantly to the development of caries.
• Progression: As the cariogenic challenge persists, the number of affected teeth tends to increase.

C. Clinical Implications

• Management: Emphasis on improving oral hygiene practices and dietary modifications can help control and reverse early carious lesions.

Type II ECC (Moderate to Severe)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Labio-lingual carious lesions primarily affect the maxillary incisors, with or without molar caries, depending on the child's age.
• Age Group: Typically seen soon after the first tooth erupts.

B. Causes

• Feeding Practices: Common causes include inappropriate use of feeding bottles, at-will breastfeeding, or a combination of both.
• Oral Hygiene: Poor oral hygiene practices exacerbate the condition.
• Progression: If not controlled, Type II ECC can progress to more advanced stages of caries.

C. Clinical Implications

• Intervention: Early intervention is crucial, including education on proper feeding practices and oral hygiene to prevent further carious development.

Type III ECC (Severe)

A. Characteristics

• Affected Teeth: Carious lesions involve almost all teeth, including the mandibular incisors.
• Age Group: Usually observed in children aged 3 to 5 years.

B. Causes

• Multifactorial: The etiology is a combination of various factors, including poor oral hygiene, dietary habits, and possibly socio-economic factors.
• Rampant Nature: This type of ECC is rampant and can affect immune tooth surfaces, leading to extensive decay.

C. Clinical Implications

• Management: Requires comprehensive dental treatment, including restorative procedures and possibly extractions. Education on preventive measures and regular dental visits are essential to manage and prevent recurrence.

Dental Burs: Design, Function, and Performance

Dental burs are essential tools in operative dentistry, used for cutting, shaping, and finishing tooth structure and restorative materials. This guide will cover the key features of dental burs, including blade design, rake angle, clearance angle, run-out, and performance characteristics.

1. Blade Design and Flutes

A. Blade Configuration

• Blades and Flutes: Blades on a bur are uniformly spaced, with depressed areas between them known as flutes. The design of the blades and flutes affects the cutting efficiency and smoothness of the bur's action.
• Number of Blades:
  • The number of blades on a bur is always even.
  • Excavating Burs: Typically have 6-10 blades, designed for efficient material removal.
  • Finishing Burs: Have 12-40 blades, providing a smoother finish.

B. Cutting Efficiency

• Smoother Cutting Action: A greater number of blades results in a smoother cutting action at low speeds.
• Reduced Efficiency: As the number of blades increases, the space between subsequent blades decreases, leading to less surface area being cut and reduced efficiency.

2. Vibration Characteristics

A. Vibration and Patient Comfort

• Vibration Frequency: Vibrations over 1,300 cycles per second are generally imperceptible to patients.
• Effect of Blade Number: Fewer blades on a bur tend to produce greater vibrations, which can affect patient comfort.
• RPM and Vibration: Higher RPMs produce less amplitude and greater frequency of vibration, contributing to a smoother experience for the patient.

3. Rake Angle

A. Definition

• Rake Angle: The angle that the face of the blade makes with a radial line from the center of the bur to the blade.

B. Cutting Efficiency

• Positive Rake Angle: Burs with a positive rake angle are generally desired for cutting efficiency.
• Rake Angle Hierarchy: The cutting efficiency is ranked as follows:
  • Positive rake > Radial rake > Negative rake
• Clogging: Burs with a positive rake angle may experience clogging due to debris accumulation.

4. Clearance Angle

A. Definition

• Clearance Angle: This angle provides clearance between the working edge and the cutting edge of the bur, allowing for effective cutting without binding.

5. Run-Out

A. Definition

• Run-Out: Refers to the eccentricity or maximum displacement of the bur head from its axis of rotation.
• Acceptable Value: The average value of clinically acceptable run-out is about 0.023 mm. Excessive run-out can lead to uneven cutting and discomfort for the patient.

6. Load Characteristics

A. Load Applied by Dentist

• Low Speed: The minimum and maximum load applied through the bur is typically between 100 – 1500 grams.
• High Speed: For high-speed burs, the load is generally between 60 – 120 grams.

7. Diamond Stones

A. Abrasive Efficiency

• Diamond Stones: These are the hardest and most efficient abrasive stones available for removing tooth enamel. They are particularly effective for cutting and finishing hard dental materials.

Surface Preparation for Mechanical Bonding

Methods for Producing Surface Roughness

• Grinding and Etching: The common methods for creating surface roughness to enhance mechanical bonding include grinding or etching the surface.
  • Grinding: This method produces gross mechanical roughness but leaves a smear layer of hydroxyapatite crystals and denatured collagen approximately 1 to 3 µm thick.
  • Etching: Etching can remove the smear layer and create a more favorable surface for bonding.

Importance of Surface Preparation

• Proper surface preparation is critical for achieving effective mechanical bonding between dental materials, ensuring the longevity and success of restorations.

Beveling in Restorative Dentistry

Beveling: Beveling refers to the process of angling the edges of a cavity preparation to create a smooth transition between the tooth structure and the restorative material. This technique can enhance the aesthetics and retention of certain materials.

Characteristics of Ceramic Materials

• Brittleness: Ceramic materials, such as porcelain, are inherently brittle and can be prone to fracture under stress.
• Bonding Mechanism: Ceramics rely on adhesive bonding to tooth structure, which can be compromised by beveling.

Contraindications

• Cavosurface Margins: Beveling the cavosurface margins of ceramic restorations is contraindicated because:
  • It can weaken the bond between the ceramic and the tooth structure.
  • It may create unsupported enamel, increasing the risk of chipping or fracture of the ceramic material.

Beveling with Amalgam Restorations

Amalgam Characteristics

• Strength and Durability: Amalgam is a strong and durable material that can withstand significant occlusal forces.
• Retention Mechanism: Amalgam relies on mechanical retention rather than adhesive bonding.

Beveling Guidelines

• General Contraindications: Beveling is generally contraindicated when using amalgam, as it can reduce the mechanical retention of the restoration.
• Exception for Class II Preparations:
  • Gingival Floor Beveling: In Class II preparations where enamel is still present, a slight bevel (approximately 15 to 20 degrees) may be placed on the gingival floor. This is done to:
    • Remove unsupported enamel rods, which can lead to enamel fracture.
    • Enhance the seal between the amalgam and the tooth structure, improving the longevity of the restoration.

Technique for Beveling

• Preparation: When beveling the gingival floor:
  • Use a fine diamond bur or a round bur to create a smooth, angled surface.
  • Ensure that the bevel is limited to the enamel portion of the wall to maintain the integrity of the underlying dentin.

Clinical Implications

A. Material Selection

• Understanding the properties of the restorative material is essential for determining the appropriate preparation technique.
• Clinicians should be aware of the contraindications for beveling based on the material being used to avoid compromising the restoration's success.

B. Restoration Longevity

• Proper preparation techniques, including appropriate beveling when indicated, can significantly impact the longevity and performance of restorations.
• Regular monitoring of restorations is essential to identify any signs of failure or degradation, particularly in areas where beveling has been performed.