Liners

Liners are relatively thin layers of material applied to the cavity preparation to protect the dentin from potential irritants and to provide a barrier against oral fluids and residual reactants from the restoration.

Types of Liners

1. Solution Liners

• Composition: Based on non-aqueous solutions of acetone, alcohol, or ether.
• Example: Varnish (e.g., Copal Wash).
  • Composition:
    • 10% copal resin
    • 90% solvent
• Setting Reaction: Physical evaporation of the solvent, leaving a thin film of copal resin.
• Coverage: A single layer of varnish covers approximately 55% of the surface area. Applying 2-3 layers can increase coverage to 60-80%.

2. Suspension Liners

• Composition: Based on aqueous solvents (water-based).
• Example: Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) liner.
• Indications: Used to protect dentinal tubules and provide a barrier against irritants.
• Disadvantage: High solubility in oral fluids, which can limit effectiveness over time.

3. Importance of Liners

A. Smear Layer

• The smear layer, which forms during cavity preparation, can decrease dentin permeability by approximately 86%, providing an additional protective barrier for the pulp.

B. Pulp Medication

• Liners can serve an important function in pulp medication, which helps prevent pulpal inflammation and promotes healing. This is particularly crucial in cases where the cavity preparation is close to the pulp.

Fillers in composite resin are inorganic particles that enhance the mechanical and optical properties of the material. They come in various sizes, shapes, and compositions. The choice of filler influences the resin's strength, wear resistance, and polishability.

Types of fillers:
- Silica: Common in microfilled and hybrid composites, providing good aesthetics and polishability.
- Glass particles: Used in macrofill and microfill composites for high strength and durability.
- Ceramic particles: Provide excellent biocompatibility and wear resistance.
- Zirconia/silica: Combined to improve the strength and translucency of the composite.
- Nanoparticles: Enhance the resin's physical properties, including strength and wear resistance, while also offering improved aesthetics.

Filler size:
- Macrofillers: 10-50 μm, suitable for class I and II restorations where high strength is not essential but a good seal is required.
- Microfillers: 0.01-10 μm, used for fine detailing and aesthetic restorations due to their ability to blend with the tooth structure.
- Hybrid fillers: Combine macro and microfillers for restorations requiring both strength and aesthetics.

Filler loading: The amount of filler in the resin affects the material's physical properties:
- High filler loading: Increases strength, wear resistance, and decreases shrinkage but can compromise the resin's ability to adapt to the tooth structure.
- Low filler loading: Provides better flow and marginal adaptation but may result in lower strength and durability.

Filler-resin interaction:
- Chemical bonding: Improves the adhesion between the filler and the resin matrix.
- Mechanical interlocking: Larger filler particles create a stronger mechanical bond within the resin.
- Polymerization shrinkage: The filler can reduce shrinkage stress, which is crucial for minimizing marginal gaps and microleakage.

Selection criteria:
- Clinical requirements: The filler should meet the specific needs of the restoration, such as strength, wear resistance, and aesthetics.
- Tooth location: Anterior teeth may require more translucent fillers for better aesthetics, while posterior teeth need stronger, more opaque materials.
- Patient's preferences: Some patients may prefer more natural-looking restorations.
- Clinician's skill: Different fillers may require varying application techniques and curing times.

Composite Cavity Preparation

Composite cavity preparations are designed to optimize the placement and retention of composite resin materials in restorative dentistry. There are three basic designs for composite cavity preparations: Conventional, Beveled Conventional, and Modified. Each design has specific characteristics and indications based on the clinical situation.

1. Conventional Preparation Design

A. Characteristics

• Design: Similar to cavity preparations for amalgam restorations.
• Shape: Box-like cavity with slight occlusal convergence, flat floors, and undercuts in dentin.
• Cavosurface Angle: Near 90° (butt joint), which provides a strong interface for the restoration.

B. Indications

• Moderate to Large Class I and Class II Restorations: Suitable for larger cavities where significant tooth structure is missing.
• Replacement of Existing Amalgam: When an existing amalgam restoration needs to be replaced, a conventional preparation is often indicated.
• Class II Cavities Extending onto the Root: In cases where the cavity extends onto the root, a conventional design is preferred to ensure adequate retention and support.

2. Beveled Conventional Preparation

A. Characteristics

• Enamel Cavosurface Bevel: Incorporation of a bevel at the enamel margin to increase surface area for bonding.
• End-on-Etching: The bevel allows for more effective etching of the enamel rods, enhancing adhesion.
• Benefits:
  • Improves retention of the composite material.
  • Reduces microleakage at the restoration interface.
  • Strengthens the remaining tooth structure.

B. Preparation Technique

• Bevel Preparation: The bevel is created using a flame-shaped diamond instrument, approximately 0.5 mm wide and angled at 45° to the external enamel surface.

C. Indications

• Large Area Restorations: Ideal for restoring larger areas of tooth structure.
• Replacing Existing Restorations: Suitable for class III, IV, and VI cavities where composite is used to replace older restorations.
• Rarely Used for Posterior Restorations: While effective, this design is less commonly used for posterior teeth due to aesthetic considerations.

3. Modified Preparation

A. Characteristics

• Depth of Preparation: Does not routinely extend into dentin; the depth is determined by the extent of the carious lesion.
• Wall Configuration: No specified wall configuration, allowing for flexibility in design.
• Conservation of Tooth Structure: Aims to conserve as much tooth structure as possible while obtaining retention through micro-mechanical means (acid etching).
• Appearance: Often has a scooped-out appearance, reflecting its conservative nature.

B. Indications

• Small Cavitated Carious Lesions: Best suited for small carious lesions that are surrounded by enamel.
• Correcting Enamel Defects: Effective for addressing minor enamel defects without extensive preparation.

C. Modified Preparation Designs

• Class III (A and B): For anterior teeth, focusing on small defects or carious lesions.
• Class IV (C and D): For anterior teeth with larger defects, ensuring minimal loss of healthy tooth structure.

Condensers/pluggers are instruments used to deliver the forces of compaction to the underlying restorative material. There are

several methods for the application of these forces:

1. Hand pressure: use of this method alone is contraindicated except in a few situations like adapting the first piece of gold to

the convenience or point angles and where the line of force will not permit use of other methods. Powdered golds are also

known to be better condensed with hand pressure. Small condenser points of 0.5 mm in diameter are generally

recommended as they do not require very high forces for their manipulation.

2. Hand malleting: Condensation by hand malleting is a team work in which the operator directs the condenser and moves it

over the surface, while the assistant provides rhythmic blows from the mallet. Long handled condensers and leather faced

mallets (50 gms in weight) are used for this purpose. The technique allows greater control and the condensers can be

changed rapidly when required. However, with the introduction of mechanical malleting, use of this method has decreased

considerably.

3. Automatic hand malleting: This method utilizes a spring loaded instrument that delivers the desired force once the spiral

spring is released. (Disadvantage is that the blow descends very rapidly even before full pressure has been exerted on the

condenser point.

4. Electric malleting (McShirley electromallet): This instrument accommodates various shapes of con-denser points and has a

mallet in the handle itself which remains dormant until wished by the operator to function. The intensity or amplitude

generated can vary from 0.2 ounces to 15 pounds and the frequency can range from 360-3600 cycles/minute.

5. Pneumatic malleting (Hollenback condenser): This is the most recent and satisfactory method first developed by

Dr. George M. Hollenback. Pneumatic mallets consist of vibrating nit condensers and detachable tips run by

compressed air. The air is carried through a thin rubber tubing attached to the hand piece. Controlling the air

pressure by a rheostat nit allows adjusting the frequency and amplitude of condensation strokes. The construction

of the handpiece is such that the blow does not fall until pressure is placed on the condenser point. This continues

until released. Pneumatic mallets are available with both straight and angled for handpieces.