Supporting Cusps in Dental Occlusion

Supporting cusps, also known as stamp cusps, centric holding cusps, or holding cusps, play a crucial role in dental occlusion and function. They are essential for effective chewing and maintaining the vertical dimension of the face. This guide will outline the characteristics, functions, and clinical significance of supporting cusps.

Supporting Cusps: These are the cusps of the maxillary and mandibular teeth that make contact during maximum intercuspation (MI) and are primarily responsible for supporting the vertical dimension of the face and facilitating effective chewing.

Location

• Maxillary Supporting Cusps: Located on the lingual occlusal line of the maxillary teeth.
• Mandibular Supporting Cusps: Located on the facial occlusal line of the mandibular teeth.

Functions of Supporting Cusps

A. Chewing Efficiency

• Mortar and Pestle Action: Supporting cusps contact the opposing teeth in their corresponding faciolingual center on a marginal ridge or a fossa, allowing them to cut, crush, and grind fibrous food effectively.
• Food Reduction: The natural tooth form, with its multiple ridges and grooves, aids in the reduction of the food bolus during chewing.

B. Stability and Alignment

• Preventing Drifting: Supporting cusps help prevent the drifting and passive eruption of teeth, maintaining proper occlusal relationships.

Characteristics of Supporting Cusps

Supporting cusps can be identified by the following five characteristic features:

1. Contact in Maximum Intercuspation (MI): They make contact with the opposing tooth during MI, providing stability in occlusion.

2. Support for Vertical Dimension: They contribute to maintaining the vertical dimension of the face, which is essential for proper facial aesthetics and function.

3. Proximity to Faciolingual Center: Supporting cusps are located nearer to the faciolingual center of the tooth compared to nonsupporting cusps, enhancing their functional role.

4. Potential for Contact on Outer Incline: The outer incline of supporting cusps has the potential for contact with opposing teeth, facilitating effective occlusion.

5. Broader, Rounded Cusp Ridges: Supporting cusps have broader and more rounded cusp ridges than nonsupporting cusps, making them better suited for crushing food.

Clinical Significance

A. Occlusal Relationships

• Maxillary vs. Mandibular Arch: The maxillary arch is larger than the mandibular arch, resulting in the supporting cusps of the maxilla being more robust and better suited for crushing food than those of the mandible.

B. Lingual Tilt of Posterior Teeth

• Height of Supporting Cusps: The lingual tilt of the posterior teeth increases the relative height of the supporting cusps compared to nonsupporting cusps, which can obscure central fossa contacts.

C. Restoration Considerations

• Restoration Fabrication: During the fabrication of restorations, it is crucial to ensure that supporting cusps do not contact opposing teeth in a manner that results in lateral deflection. Instead, restorations should provide contacts on plateaus or smoothly concave fossae to direct masticatory forces parallel to the long axes of the teeth.

Incipient Lesions

Characteristics of Incipient Lesions

• Body of the Lesion: The body of the incipient lesion is the largest portion during the demineralizing phase, characterized by varying pore volumes (5% at the periphery to 25% at the center).
• Striae of Retzius: The striae of Retzius are well marked in the body of the lesion, indicating areas of preferential mineral dissolution. These striae represent the incremental growth lines of enamel and are critical in understanding caries progression.

Caries Penetration

• Initial Penetration: The first penetration of caries occurs via the striae of Retzius, highlighting the importance of these structures in the carious process. Understanding this can aid in the development of preventive strategies and treatment plans aimed at early intervention and management of carious lesions.

Gingival Seat in Class II Restorations

The gingival seat is a critical component of Class II restorations, particularly in ensuring proper adaptation and retention of the restorative material. This guide outlines the key considerations for the gingival seat in Class II restorations, including its extension, clearance, beveling, and wall placement.

1. Extension of the Gingival Seat

A. Apical Extension

• Apical to Proximal Contact or Caries: The gingival seat should extend apically to the proximal contact point or the extent of caries, whichever is greater. This ensures that all carious tissue is removed and that the restoration has adequate retention.

2. Clearance from Adjacent Tooth

A. Clearance Requirement

• Adjacent Tooth Clearance: The gingival seat should clear the adjacent tooth by approximately 0.5 mm. This clearance is essential to prevent damage to the adjacent tooth and to allow for proper adaptation of the restorative material.

3. Beveling of the Gingival Margin

A. Bevel Angles

• Amalgam Restorations: For amalgam restorations, the gingival margin is typically beveled at an angle of 15-20 degrees. This bevel helps to improve the adaptation of the amalgam and reduce the risk of marginal failure.

• Cast Restorations: For cast restorations, the gingival margin is beveled at a steeper angle of 30-40 degrees. This angle enhances the strength of the margin and provides better retention for the cast material.

B. Contraindications for Beveling

• Root Surface Location: If the gingival seat is located on the root surface, beveling is contraindicated. This is to maintain the integrity of the root surface and avoid compromising the periodontal attachment.

4. Wall Placement

A. Facial and Lingual Walls

• Extension of Walls: The facial and lingual walls of the proximal box should be extended such that they clear the adjacent tooth by 0.2-0.3 mm. This clearance helps to ensure that the restoration does not impinge on the adjacent tooth and allows for proper contouring of the restoration.

B. Embrasure Placement

• Placement in Embrasures: The facial and lingual walls should be positioned in their respective embrasures. This placement helps to optimize the aesthetics and function of the restoration while providing adequate support.

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is a minimally invasive approach to dental cavity management and restoration. Developed as a response to the limitations of traditional drilling and filling methods, ART aims to preserve as much of the natural tooth structure as possible while effectively managing caries. The technique was pioneered in the mid-1980s by Dr. Frencken in Tanzania as a way to address the high prevalence of dental decay in a setting with limited access to traditional dental equipment and materials. The term "ART" was coined by Dr. McLean to reflect the gentle and non-traumatic nature of the treatment.

ART involves the following steps:

1. Cleaning and Preparation: The tooth is cleaned with a hand instrument to remove plaque and debris.
2. Moisture Control: The tooth is kept moist with a gel or paste to prevent desiccation and maintain the integrity of the tooth structure.
3. Carious Tissue Removal: Soft, decayed tissue is removed manually with hand instruments, without the use of rotary instruments or drills.
4. Restoration: The prepared cavity is restored with an adhesive material, typically glass ionomer cement, which chemically bonds to the tooth structure and releases fluoride to prevent further decay.

Indications for ART include:

- Small to medium-sized cavities in posterior teeth (molars and premolars).
- Decay in the initial stages that has not yet reached the dental pulp.
- Patients who may not tolerate or have access to traditional restorative methods, such as those in remote or underprivileged areas.
- Children or individuals with special needs who may benefit from a less invasive and less time-consuming approach.
- As part of a public health program focused on preventive and minimal intervention dentistry.

Contraindications for ART include:

- Large cavities that extend into the pulp chamber or involve extensive tooth decay.
- Presence of active infection, swelling, abscess, or fistula around the tooth.
- Teeth with poor prognosis or severe damage that require more extensive treatment such as root canal therapy or extraction.
- Inaccessible cavities where hand instruments cannot effectively remove decay or place the restorative material.

The ART technique is advantageous in several ways:

- It reduces the need for local anesthesia, as it is often painless.
- It preserves more of the natural tooth structure.
- It is less technique-sensitive and does not require advanced equipment.
- It is relatively quick and can be performed in a single visit.
- It is suitable for use in areas with limited resources and less developed dental infrastructure.
- It reduces the risk of microleakage and secondary caries.

However, ART also has limitations, such as reduced longevity compared to amalgam or composite fillings, especially in large restorations or high-stress areas, and the need for careful moisture control during the procedure to ensure proper bonding of the material. Additionally, ART is not recommended for all cases and should be considered on an individual basis, taking into account the patient's oral health status and the specific requirements of each tooth.

Liners

Liners are relatively thin layers of material applied to the cavity preparation to protect the dentin from potential irritants and to provide a barrier against oral fluids and residual reactants from the restoration.

Types of Liners

1. Solution Liners

• Composition: Based on non-aqueous solutions of acetone, alcohol, or ether.
• Example: Varnish (e.g., Copal Wash).
  • Composition:
    • 10% copal resin
    • 90% solvent
• Setting Reaction: Physical evaporation of the solvent, leaving a thin film of copal resin.
• Coverage: A single layer of varnish covers approximately 55% of the surface area. Applying 2-3 layers can increase coverage to 60-80%.

2. Suspension Liners

• Composition: Based on aqueous solvents (water-based).
• Example: Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂) liner.
• Indications: Used to protect dentinal tubules and provide a barrier against irritants.
• Disadvantage: High solubility in oral fluids, which can limit effectiveness over time.

3. Importance of Liners

A. Smear Layer

• The smear layer, which forms during cavity preparation, can decrease dentin permeability by approximately 86%, providing an additional protective barrier for the pulp.

B. Pulp Medication

• Liners can serve an important function in pulp medication, which helps prevent pulpal inflammation and promotes healing. This is particularly crucial in cases where the cavity preparation is close to the pulp.

Composition of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Powder

Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) is a widely used dental material known for its adhesive properties, biocompatibility, and fluoride release. The powder component of GIC plays a crucial role in its setting reaction and overall performance. Below is an overview of the typical composition of GIC powder.

1. Basic Components of GIC Powder

A. Glass Powder

• Fluorosilicate Glass: The primary component of GIC powder is a specially formulated glass, often referred to as fluorosilicate glass. This glass is composed of:
  • Silica (SiO₂): Provides the structural framework of the glass.
  • Alumina (Al₂O₃): Enhances the strength and stability of the glass.
  • Calcium Fluoride (CaF₂): Contributes to the fluoride release properties of the cement, which is beneficial for caries prevention.
  • Sodium Fluoride (NaF): Sometimes included to further enhance fluoride release.
  • Barium or Strontium Oxide: May be added to improve radiopacity, allowing for better visibility on radiographs.

B. Other Additives

• Modifiers: Various modifiers may be added to the glass powder to enhance specific properties, such as:
  • Zinc Oxide (ZnO): Can be included to improve the mechanical properties and setting characteristics.
  • Titanium Dioxide (TiO₂): Sometimes added to enhance the aesthetic properties and opacity of the cement.

2. Properties of GIC Powder

A. Reactivity

• The glass powder reacts with the acidic liquid component (usually polyacrylic acid) to form a gel-like matrix that hardens over time. This reaction is crucial for the setting and bonding of the cement to tooth structure.

B. Fluoride Release

• One of the key benefits of GIC is its ability to release fluoride ions over time, which can help in the prevention of secondary caries and promote remineralization of the tooth structure.

C. Biocompatibility

• GIC powders are designed to be biocompatible, making them suitable for use in various dental applications, including restorations, liners, and bases.

Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Powder-Liquid Composition

Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) is a widely used dental material known for its adhesive properties, biocompatibility, and fluoride release. The composition of GIC involves a powder-liquid system, where the liquid component plays a crucial role in the setting and performance of the cement. Below is an overview of the composition of GIC liquid, its components, and their functions.

1. Composition of GIC Liquid

A. Basic Components

The liquid component of GIC is primarily an aqueous solution containing various polymers and copolymers. The typical composition includes:

• Polyacrylic Acid (40-50%):

  • This is the primary component of the liquid, providing the acidic environment necessary for the reaction with the glass powder.
  • It may also include Itaconic Acid and Maleic Acid, which enhance the properties of the cement.

• Tartaric Acid (6-15%):

  • Tartaric acid is added to improve the handling characteristics of the cement and increase the working time.
  • It also shortens the setting time, making it essential for clinical applications.

• Water (30%):

  • Water serves as the solvent for the other components, facilitating the mixing and reaction process.

B. Modifications to Improve Performance

To enhance the performance of the GIC liquid, several modifications are made:

1. Addition of Itaconic and Tricarboxylic Acids:

   • Decrease Viscosity: These acids help lower the viscosity of the liquid, making it easier to handle and mix.
   • Promote Reactivity: They enhance the reactivity between the glass powder and the liquid, leading to a more effective setting reaction.
   • Prevent Gelation: By reducing hydrogen bonding between polyacrylic acid chains, these acids help prevent gelation of the liquid over time.

2. Polymaleic Acid:

   • Often included in the liquid, polymaleic acid is a stronger acid than polyacrylic acid.
   • It accelerates the hardening process and reduces moisture sensitivity due to its higher number of carboxyl (COOH) groups, which promote rapid polycarboxylate crosslinking.
   • This allows for the use of more conventional, less reactive glasses, resulting in a more aesthetic final set cement.

2. Functions of Liquid Components

A. Polyacrylic Acid

• Role: Acts as the primary acid that reacts with the glass powder to form the cement matrix.
• Properties: Provides adhesion to tooth structure and contributes to the overall strength of the set cement.

B. Tartaric Acid

• Role: Enhances the working characteristics of the cement, allowing for better manipulation during application.
• Impact on Setting: While it increases working time, it also shortens the setting time, requiring careful management during clinical use.

C. Water

• Role: Essential for dissolving the acids and facilitating the chemical reaction between the liquid and the glass powder.
• Impact on Viscosity: The water content helps maintain the appropriate viscosity for mixing and application.

3. Stability and Shelf Life

• Viscosity Changes: The viscosity of tartaric acid-containing cement generally remains stable over its shelf life. However, if the cement is past its expiration date, viscosity changes may occur, affecting its handling and performance.
• Storage Conditions: Proper storage conditions are essential to maintain the integrity of the liquid and prevent degradation.